Assessment of Coliforms Bacteria Contamination in Lake Tanganyika as Bioindicators of Recreational and Drinking Water Quality
Lambert Niyoyitungiye, Anirudha Giri, Marc Ndayisenga
South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology · pp. 9–16 · Published 3 Jun 2020
10.9734/sajrm/2020/v6i330150Abstract
Worldwide coliform bacteria are used as indicators of environmental and fecal contamination and hence, the possible presence of pathogenic organisms. As most people living on the shores of Lake Tanganyika use its water for cooking, drinking and washing; the monitoring of organisms indicating water pollution is more predictive of the presence of certain pathogens to protect public health. This study was carried out along the Burundian coast at 4 sampling sites (Kajaga, Nyamugari, Rumonge and Mvugo) in the months of January, February and March 2018, to assess quantitatively the presence of coliform bacteria in comparison to the standards recommended by BIS-10500 (1991, 2012) and WWF-Pakistan (2007) for drinking and recreational water quality and to sensitize the populace using the untreated water about the potential health risks. The ColonyForming Unit (CFU) method was used and the results showed that total coliform bacteriaobtained was in the range of 9000 to 60000 CFU/100 mLand are indicative of environmental contamination of all sampling stations with an average of 33250 CFU/100 mL. Fecal coliform bacteria ranged from 0 to 5000 CFU/100 mL with an overall average of 2000 CFU/100 m Land Kajaga site appeared free of contamination as fecal coliform count there was nil. The Escherichia coli count recorded ranged from 0 to 3000 CFU/100 mL with an average of 1350 CFU/100 mL. At Kajaga stations, Escherichia coli count was 0 and therefore there is no evidence of recent fecal contamination. Thus, if only fecal contamination is taken into account, the water from Kajaga station can be considered as safe for drinking and bathing purposes but incidentally total coliforms were found at Kajagastation. The water from all sampling stations require treatment before any use.
Cited by 22
ZOUHIR BOULGUERAGUER, HICHAM CHAFFAI, LAKHDAR GASMI · Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity · 2022
Janet Beyuo, Abdul-Razak Issifu Yidana, Ramatu Mustapha · Environmental Challenges · 2023
Nhu Da Le, Thi Mai Huong Nguyen, Thi Thu Ha Hoang · Aquatic Sciences · 2024
Abhijeet Das · Springer Geography · 2025
Djihad Chenna, Hadia Hemmami, Ilham Ben Amor · Water, Air, & Soil Pollution · 2025
Chaitanya Gottapu, Chinnam Bindu Kiranmayi, Tumati Srinivasa Rao · Indian Journal of Veterinary Public Health · 2025
Assadullah Samadi, Mohammad Haroon Rahmani, Asmatullah Isaar · Journal of Natural Science Review · 2025
Valentin Vershinin, Arlette Ntindekure · INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL JOURNAL · 2025
Jenny Flores Garcia, Davide Palma, Iván Sciscenko · Lecture Notes in Chemistry · 2024
Pulwansha T. Amandi Thilakarathna, Fazla Fareed, Sarangi N.P. Athukorala · Environmental Pollution · 2025
Showing 20 of 22 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
22
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.