An Investigation of the Role of Population Age Structure and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Africa
Journal of Economics, Management and Trade · pp. 1–13 · Published 12 Oct 2017
10.9734/JEMT/2017/27663Abstract
The study investigates the effects of population age structure, that is, the number of people who could potentially be economically active (15-65 years) on carbon dioxide emissions in Africa at different income levels. The study seeks to determine whether the economically active population of the African countries play significant roles in the rising carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions on the continent or not. We employed fixed effects, random effects and generalized least squares (GLS) estimators, and measures the quantitative impacts from an augmented STIRPAT model constructed assuming that population structure, manufacturing sector, the services sector, final consumption expenditure (annual growth) are the predictors of CO2 emissions (environmental impacts). The findings suggest mixed results of positive and negative impacts of population age structure: The quantitative impacts indicate that the average impact of population age structure on CO2 emissions, when the population age structure change across time and between countries in LICA and UICA increases by 1 per cent, reduces CO2 emissions by about 0.67 per cent and 1.08 per cent respectively, holding all other predictors constant. Whereas the estimated results indicate that the average impact of population-age-structure on CO2 emissions, when the population structure change across time and between countries in LMICA increases by 1 per cent, increases CO2 emissions by about 0.52 percent, holding all other predictors constant. The implication is that in lower-middle-income-countries in Africa the active-population-age groups (15-65 years) play a significant role in carbon-dioxide-emissions load in the continent, whereas in low-income-countries and upper-income-countries in Africa the reverse is the case.
References (17)
- 1 Analysis of Panel Data [DOI]
- 2 Data analysis
- 3 The New Growth Evidence [DOI]
- 4 The Ultimate Resource [DOI]
- 5 That BLUP is a Good Thing: The Estimation of Random Effects [DOI]
- 6 Random group effects and the precision of regression estimates [DOI]
- 7 Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity [DOI]
- 8 The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975–1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data [DOI]
- 9 Population and technological change: A study of long-term trends
- 10 An Essay on the Principle of Population [DOI]
- 11 Age-structure, urbanization, and climate change in developed countries: revisiting STIRPAT for disaggregated population and consumption-related environmental impacts [DOI]
- 12 Human population and the global environment.
- 13 A framework for sustainability science: A renovated IPAT identity [DOI]
- 14 Resources, Population, Environment: An Oversupply of False Bad News [DOI]
- 15 Environment, Population, and Technology in Primitive Societies [DOI]
- 16 Environmental disruption or environmental improvement
- 17 Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
Cited by 3
Kingsley Ikechukwu Okere, Onyemachi Maxwell Ogbulu, Favour Chidinma Onuoha · OPEC Energy Review · 2021
Showing 1 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
29
Page views
0
PDF downloads
6
Outbound clicks
3
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.