Analysis of the Arguments Presented in Response to the Allegations against an Online Education Website
Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences · pp. 1–16 · Published 16 Oct 2017
10.9734/ARJASS/2017/34974Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the arguments in an article written by an online education website in response to accusations of fraud and misconduct levelled in another article published by a popular news magazine. This paper aims to analyze the arguments by applying Damer’s model of argument analysis. The analysis follows the arguments criteria of structure, relevance, acceptability, sufficiency and effectiveness of rebuttal. The paper also aims to unravel the fallacies used in the arguments that violate the criteria of construction of good arguments. The analysis may help to find out whether the arguments presented by that website were strong enough or simply deceptive in trying to prove the accusations as false.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Teaching and Learning: A Case of the Schools Under Thrimshing Cluster, Trashigang — shares topic coverage
- Grit in Online Education — shares topic coverage
- Perceptions of Students from Northwestern Romania on Online Education during the Pandemic COVID-19 — shares topic coverage
- Factors Affecting School Teachers' Satisfaction with Online Classes during the Outbreak of COVID-19 — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.