Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Data Governance in AI - Enabled Healthcare Systems: A Case of the Project Nightingale

Aisha Temitope Arigbabu, Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi, Chinasa Susan Adigwe, Olubukola Omolara Adebiyi, Samson Abidemi Ajayi

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 85–107 · Published 8 Mar 2024

10.9734/ajrcos/2024/v17i5441

Abstract

The study investigates data governance challenges within AI-enabled healthcare systems, focusing on Project Nightingale as a case study to elucidate the complexities of balancing technological advancements with patient privacy and trust. Utilizing a survey methodology, data were collected from 843 healthcare service users employing a structured questionnaire designed to measure perceptions of AI in healthcare, trust in healthcare providers, concerns about data privacy, and the impact of regulatory frameworks on the adoption of AI technologies. The reliability of the survey instrument was confirmed with a Cronbach's Alpha of 0.81, indicating high internal consistency. The multiple regression analysis revealed significant findings: a positive relationship between the awareness of technological projects and trust in healthcare providers, countered by a negative impact of privacy concerns on trust. Additionally, familiarity with and perceived effectiveness of regulatory frameworks were positively correlated with trust in data, while perceptions of regulatory constraints and data governance issues were identified as significant barriers to the effective adoption of AI technologies in healthcare. The study highlights the critical need for enhanced transparency, public awareness, and robust data governance frameworks to navigate the ethical and privacy concerns associated with AI in healthcare. The study recommends adopting flexible, principle-based regulatory approaches and fostering multi-stakeholder collaboration to ensure the ethical deployment of AI technologies that prioritize patient welfare and trust.

AI-enabled healthcare data governance patient privacy regulatory frameworks trust in healthcare project nightingale ethical AI development healthcare data security

Cited by 42

Formulating Global Policies and Strategies for Combating Criminal Use and Abuse of Artificial Intelligence

Amaka Debie Samuel-Okon, Omobolaji Olufunmilayo Olateju, Samuel Ufom Okon · Archives of Current Research International · 2024

Telecare legislation priorities: A Delphi study grounded in ethical challenges

Seongyu Han, Eun Kyoung Yun · Nursing Ethics · 2025

Shaping trust and tension: Strategic leaks and their impact on global cybersecurity norms

Adebayo Yusuf Balogun, Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi, Adegbenga Ismaila Alao · International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences · 2025

The Importance of AI Data Governance in Large Language Models

Saurabh Pahune, Zahid Akhtar, Venkatesh Mandapati · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · 2025

Personal Data Privacy and Security at Individual and Organizational Levels

Jasbir Kaur, Shiney Chib, Guru Basava Aradhya S. · User-Centric Cybersecurity Implications for Sustainable Digital Transformation · 2025

Data Governance Frameworks for Large-Scale Healthcare Systems: A Comparative Study

Nikitha Edulakanti · Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management · 2025

Innovative Regulation of Open Source Intelligence and Deepfakes AI in Managing Public Trust

Onyinye Obioha Val, Michael Olayinka Gbadebo, Oluwaseun Oladeji Olaniyi · 2025

Showing 20 of 42 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

42

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.