Colorectal Cancer Screening: Insights from A Prospective National Survey of Patients and Healthcare Providers
David A. Johnson, Katie S. Lucero, John Maeglin, Shari Dermer, Douglas K. Rex
International Research Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · pp. 73–82 · Published 14 Apr 2022
Abstract
Offering screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) to all age-appropriate and medically suitable patients is the standard of medical care in the United States. Provider advice is important for patients to accept screening for CRC. Previous research suggests that physicians’ self-directed screening practices might influence the screening choices they recommend for their patients. The way physicians discuss CRC screening also might influence what method patients select. This 2-part, web-based survey evaluated (a) whether screening options recommended to the patients of primary care physicians (PCPs), obstetricians, and gynecologists aligned with screening choices they selected for themselves, and (b) provider-patient communication factors that predict patient selection of colonoscopy for CRC screening. Results suggest that PCPs’ recommendations to their patients for CRC screening is not correlated with what PCPs select for themselves. PCPs elect to discuss screening options and let the patient choose. The second part of the study showed from the patient perspective, when multiple CRC screening options are presented, patients are less likely to select colonoscopy even though patients place high value on detection of precancerous polyps for which colonoscopy is the gold standard. Education to address these findings will require a better understanding of patients’ decision-making processes. Furthermore, strategies to better align physician-recommended patient CRC screening with what they select as “best practice” for themselves may be needed. However, education could be offered to better inform patients of the benefits and limitations of different CRC screening methods and help clinicians understand their implicit biases that may present in discussions with patients about options for CRC screening.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Expectations and Realities: The Views and Experiences of HIV/AIDS Patients on Ghana’s National Health Insurance Scheme — shares topic coverage
- Availability and Readiness of Antenatal Care in the Primary Healthcare Setting in Ogoniland — shares topic coverage
- Satisfaction with Quality of Health Care among Teaching Hospitals in Kathmandu, Nepal — shares topic coverage
- Medical Tourism, Public Health and Economic Development in Nigeria: Issues and Prospects — shares topic coverage
- A Preliminary Review of Diversity in the Healthcare Workplace — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.