Comparative Analysis for the Treatment of Hemorrhoids Using Harmonic Scalpel versus Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy: A Single-Center Experience

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhoidectomy is one of the most effective treatments for Grade III/IV hemorrhoids. This study was aimed to compare the outcomes and postoperative complications arising from the harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Methods: In this retrospective study, 1120 patients were operated on for symptomatic Grade III/IV hemorrhoids during April 2004-April 2020. In the conventional hemorrhoidectomy patient group, the operation was performed by Ferguson closed method using monopolar electrocautery, while the other patient group was operated using a harmonic scalpel. Patient demographic data and common patient complaints were recorded. Operation duration and blood loss during the procedure were noted. Regular follow up of the patients was done for 4 weeks, and postoperative pain relief was recorded using the Visual Analog Scale. Finally, patient satisfaction and complete wound healing were analyzed along with postoperative complications like incontinence, secondary hemorrhage, recurrence, and anal stenosis. Results: The patient demographic characteristics and preoperative complaints were similar for both groups. Harmonic scalpel procedure resulted in shorter operation time and less blood loss. Postoperative pain relief was substantially better in the patient group who underwent harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy. Harmonic hemorrhoidectomy procedure also resulted in higher patient satisfaction and wound healing. Minimal postoperative complications were observed for both groups. Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and effective procedure that achieves simultaneous tissue and vessel sealing. It reduces the duration of the operation, blood loss, postoperative pain, and complications compared to a conventional hemorrhoidectomy procedure.