Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Comparative Analysis on Cost-Economics Evaluation of Robotic Tiller-Planter against Conventional Tillage and Planting Operations

Sunil Kumar Rathod, H. L. Kushwaha, Adarsh Kumar, Tapan Kumar Khura, Rajeev Kumar, Anchal Dass, Debashish Chakraborty, Susheel Kumar Sarkar, Asha K. R., Pankaj Malkani, Rohit Gaddamwar, Madhusudan B. S., Pradeep Kumar

International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 433–442 · Published 16 Jan 2024

10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i13853

Abstract

The labor-intensive, costly, and time-consuming nature of manual tillage and planting in maize cultivation necessitates the integration of mechanized and robotic methods. This study focuses on the economic evaluation of a Robotic tiller-planter as a solution to address these challenges. Precise robotic tilling and planting methods aim to mitigate cultivation costs, reduce time requirements, and enhance worker comfort. Through a thorough assessment of ownership and operational expenses, farmers gain valuable insights to make informed decisions regarding the adoption of precise robotic machinery, optimization of existing equipment, or exploration of alternative methods for improved farm productivity and financial outcomes. The study compares the Robotic tiller-planter with conventional tillage and planting methods, revealing ownership and operating costs of 172.48 Rs/h and 126.44 Rs/h, respectively. The comparative analysis demonstrated a remarkable 61.58% time savings and a 54.72% reduction in costs during tilling and planting when utilizing the Robotic tiller-planter compared to conventional methods. The findings highlight the cost-effectiveness and environmental benefits associated with the robotic system. This research provides farmers with crucial insights, promoting the adoption of advanced agricultural technologies to optimize resource utilization, improve efficiency, and substitute sustainable farming practices.

Robotic spot-tiller cum planter cost economics operating cost ownership cost break-even point payback period

Cited by 2

Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

2

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.