MODFLOW’s River Package: Part 2: Correction, Combining Analytical and Numerical Approaches
Physical Science International Journal · pp. 1–23 · Published 5 Jul 2019
10.9734/psij/2019/v22i330131Abstract
Most widely used integrated hydrologic models still describe the flow interaction between streams and aquifers using primitive early concepts. In the previous article the shortcomings of the methodology were shown in great details. In this second part means are presented by which improvements can be introduced into the procedures. Accuracy and numerical efficiency will be improved. The article describes in details the proposed alternatives for both the saturated and the unsaturated connections. In the article reference is made specifically to the code MODFLOW. Most of the other integrated hydrologic models used for large-scale regional studies apply essentially the same methodology to estimate seepage.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Technical Assessment on the Operational Performance of Fish Pond in Lagos State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- A Review on Effects and Control of Seepage through Earth-fill Dam — shares topic coverage
- MODFLOW’s River Package: Part 1: A Critique — shares topic coverage
- Analytical River Routing with Alternative Methods to Estimate Seepage — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.