Comparative Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated with ACEIs/ ARBs Versus Sacubitril/Valsartan
Israt Islam, Rezaul Karim, Md. Nurul Amin, Azaz Bin Sharif, Md. Moklesur Rahman Sarkar, Smriti Rani Sarkar
Asian Journal of Cardiology Research · pp. 400–407 · Published 1 Jul 2025
10.9734/ajcr/2025/v8i1292Abstract
Background: Millions of people worldwide are affected by the very serious condition of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Both ACEI/ARB and Sacubitril/Valsartan are important treatments, even though we lack many real-world comparisons. Objective: the aim of the study is to identify the differences in outcomes observed in patients with HFrEF taking Sacubitril/Valsartan versus ACEI/ARB treatment. Methodology: An observational cohort study was conducted with 114 patients with HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%) and categorized into Group A (treated with ACEI/ARB) and Group B (treated with Sacubitril/Valsartan). The study timeline was July 2023 and September 2024 at Ibrahim Cardiac Hospital & Research Institute. Relevant measurements (EF, SBP, HR, NT-proBNP, eGFR, potassium, NYHA class, symptoms, and adverse events) were recorded both before and after treatment. The statistical analysis employed SPSS for t-tests, chi-square tests, and odds ratios (only the results with p<0.05 were considered significant). Results: The mean baseline EF was lower for Group B (33.69%) than for Group A (36.67%), and this difference was significant (p=0.017). Following the treatment course, there was no real difference in EF improvement between the groups (Group A: 53.3%, Group B: 58.0%, p=0.473). The SBP was lower in Group B (115.6 mmHg) than in Group A (125.0 mmHg), and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.023). Group A had an 87.5% increase in NYHA Class I, higher than Group B’s 67.8% (p=0.056). Similar adverse effects were noted in patients (hyperkalemia, hypotension, renal impairment). Mortality (4.2% for group A and 2.2% for group B) and rehospitalization (4.2% for group A and 1.1% for group B) were not significantly different (p>0.05). There were no major differences in symptom relief for dyspnea, orthopnea, or PND (p>0.6). Conclusion: Sacubitril/Valsartan and Enalapril were found to be effective in treating HFrEF and gave similar safety and outcome results, though Sacubitril/Valsartan did a better job of controlling the heart’s blood flow.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Prognostic Value of NT-proBNP Concentrations in Patients Attending a Hospital Cardiac Service — shares topic coverage
- STEMI as the Initial Presentation of Polyarteritis Nodosa Associated with Hepatitis B: A Rare Cardiovascular Manifestation — shares topic coverage
- Determination of the CRS1 Incidence in ADHF Patients with Identification of Its Independent Predictors and Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes among the Patients — shares topic coverage
- Home Care Security (HOCAS): A Telemedicine Project to Monitor Patients with Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation under Anticoagulation at Home — shares topic coverage
- Comprehensive Nursing Interventions in Heart Failure Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.