Evaluation of the Different Methods for Fixation of Sagittal Ramus Split Osteotomy of the Mandibular Ramus in Relation to Stability for Mandibular Advancement: A Systematic Review
Luiza Roberta Bin, Natasha Magro Érnica, Eleonor Álvaro Garbin Júnior, Geraldo Griza, Ricardo Conci, Letícia Nadal
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 111–121 · Published 24 Mar 2020
10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i330390Abstract
Aims: The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the different fixation methods available for sagittal ramus split osteotomy associated with mandibular advancement tested in vitro to evaluate stability of each method. Study Design: Systematic review. Methodology: Following the PRISMA model for systematic reviews, a query was made in the PubMed, Bireme and Cochrane Library databases, identifying articles that reported the different fixation methods for sagittal ramus split osteotomy for mandibular advancement. Results: A total of 352 articles were identified, 11 papers of which, after evaluation in relation to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were systematically reviewed. Conclusion: Sagittal ramus split osteotomy is a technique performed for the treatment of mandibular discrepancies in which the methods for fixation of the segments are quite varied. In view of the biomechanical studies, the hybrid technique is the most indicated method, while miniplates with monocortical screws present less stability.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy: Is Anything Else to Facilitate the Technique? — shares topic coverage
- Surgical Management of Class III Skeletal — shares topic coverage
- Patients' Satisfaction after Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review — shares topic coverage
- Comparison of Frequency of Non-Union in Patients of Displaced Fracture Neck of Femur Treated with Dynamic Hip Screw versus Cannulated Screw Fixation — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.