Has the Pandemic Triggered a ‘Paperdemic’? Towards an Assessment of Diagnostic Indicators for COVID-19
Ali Muhammad Ali Rushdi, Hamzah Abdul Majid Serag
International Journal of Pathogen Research · pp. 28–49 · Published 1 Mar 2021
10.9734/ijpr/2021/v6i230158Abstract
This paper is a preliminary step towards the assessment of an alarming widespread belief that victims of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 include the quality and accuracy of scientific publications about it. Our initial results suggest that this belief cannot be readily ignored, denied, dismissed or refuted, since some genuine supporting evidence can be forwarded for it. This evidence includes an obvious increase in retractions of papers published about the COVID-19 pandemic plus an extra-ordinary phenomenon of inconsistency that we report herein. In fact, we provide a novel method for validating any purported set of the four most prominent indicators of diagnostic testing (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value), by observing that these indicators constitute three rather than four independent quantities. This observation has virtually been unheard of in the open medical literature, and hence researchers have not taken it into consideration. We define two functions, which serve as consistency criteria, since each of them checks consistency for any set of four numerical values (naturally belonging to the interval [0.0,1.0]) claimed to be the four basic diagnostic indicators. Most of the data we came across in various international journals met our criteria for consistency, but in a few cases, there were obvious unexplained blunders. We explored the same consistency problem for some diagnostic data published in 2020 concerning the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and observed that the afore-mentioned unexplained blunders tended to be on the rise. A systematic extensive statistical assessment of this presumed tendency is warranted.
References (44)
- 1 How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data [DOI]
- 2 What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic [DOI]
- 3 Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening? [DOI]
- 4 Against pandemic research exceptionalism [DOI]
- 5 A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools [DOI]
- 6 Critical appraisal of published research: introductory guidelines. [DOI]
- 7 The Accuracy of Floating Point Summation [DOI]
- 8 A review of critical appraisal tools show they lack rigor: Alternative tool structure is proposed [DOI]
- 9 Medicine,Health Care and Philosophy [DOI]
- 10 The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials [DOI]
- 11 How to critically appraise an article [DOI]
- 12 The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials [DOI]
- 13 The limitations of retraction notices and the heroic acts of authors who correct the scholarly record: An analysis of retractions of papers published from 1975 to 2019 [DOI]
- 14 Retracted COVID-19 articles: a side-effect of the hot race to publication [DOI]
- 15 No time for that now! Qualitative changes in manuscript peer review during the Covid-19 pandemic [DOI]
- 16 Four Proposals to Help Improve the Medical Research Literature [DOI]
- 17 Guidelines for Reporting Medical Research: A Critical Appraisal [DOI]
- 18 An “alarming” and “exceptionally high” rate of COVID-19 retractions? [DOI]
- 19 Optimizing peer review to minimize the risk of retracting COVID-19-related literature [DOI]
- 20 High-precision floating-point arithmetic in scientific computation [DOI]
- 21 The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them) [DOI]
- 22 Karnaugh-Map Utility in Medical Studies: The Case of Fetal Malnutrition [DOI]
- 23 An Appraisal of the Carlisle-Stouffer-Fisher Method for Assessing Study Data Integrity and Fraud [DOI]
- 24 The Decline of the Experimental Paradigm During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Template for the Future [DOI]
- 25 The value of statistical tools to detect data fabrication [DOI]
- 26 Clinician-researcher’s perspectives on clinical research during the COVID19 pandemic [DOI]
- 27 The “first digit law” – A hypothesis on its possible impact on medicine and development aid [DOI]
- 28 Common Fallacies of Probability in Medical Context: A Simple Mathematical Exposition [DOI]
- 29 Mathematics and Examples of the Modern Syllogistic Method of Propositional Logic [DOI]
- 30 Karnaugh-map Utilization in Coincidence Analysis [DOI]
- 31 A Tutorial on How to Efficiently Calculate and Format Tables of the Binomial Distribution [DOI]
- 32 Checking Consistency among the Four Basic Indicators of Diagnostic Testing in Saudi Medical Journals
- 33 ON SELF-INVERSE BINARY MATRICES OVER THE BINARY GALOIS FIELD [DOI]
- 34 A table for the lower boundary of the region of useful redundancy for k-out-of-n systems [DOI]
- 35 Analysis of round-off errors [DOI]
- 36 The Eigenvectors of the Transition Matrix as Predictors of the Dynamics of a Synchronous Boolean Network [DOI]
- 37 Write a Scientific Paper (WASP): Guidelines for reporting medical research [DOI]
- 38 Reform retractions to make them more transparent [DOI]
- 39 Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? [DOI]
- 40 An alarming retraction rate for scientific publications on Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [DOI]
- 41 Retraction in the era of COVID-19 and its influence on evidence-based medicine: is science in jeopardy? [DOI]
- 42 Just Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone [DOI]
- 43 Detection of data fabrication using statistical tools [DOI]
- 44 Issues in the statistical detection of data fabrication and data errors in the scientific literature: simulation study and reanalysis of Carlisle, 2017 [DOI]
Cited by 3
M. Dupuis, J. Studer, Matthias Wicki · PLoS ONE · 2023
A. Rushdi, Hamzah Abdul Majid Serag · 2021
Showing 2 of 3 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- COVID 19 Disease Caused by Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) — shares topic coverage
- Assessment of Anxiety in Healthcare Providers Working in ICU during COVID-19 Pandemics — shares topic coverage
- Azithromycin and Hydroxychloroquine Accelerate Recovery of Outpatients with Mild/Moderate COVID-19 — shares topic coverage
- Elevated Levels of Lactate Dehydrogenase Predicts Poor Outcomes for Patients with COVID-19: A Review — shares topic coverage
- Addressing the Challenges of Containing Covid-19 Spread in a Rural, Poor Area in India: A Case Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
3
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.