Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Impact of Performance Evaluation Criteria on Intelligent Tuning

Mohammed Majid M. Al Khalidy, Luisella Balbis

Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 1–14 · Published 31 Dec 2015

10.9734/BJAST/2016/23146

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of automatically tuning in an intelligent manner so that a balance between efficiency and computational speed is reached. In this paper a new proposed technique which uses Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to compute the best optimal value for the PID parameters are presented. In this study two different performance criteria are used simultaneously for the optimization problem, namely Integral of Time-weighted Absolute Error (ITAE) and an output response based performance criteria (Fitness Function). The integration between the two performance criteria produces two distinct tuning techniques called Error-Fitness PSO (EFPSO) and Fitness-Error PSO (FEPSO). This paper also proposes new modified Time Varying Acceleration Coefficients (TVAC) that is used in the PSO algorithm. Finally, simulation experiment on a single degree of freedom robotic arm shows that the proposed techniques can produce optimal PID gains with good computational efficiency and improved step response characteristics. The proposed integration techniques can highly improve the PID tuning optimization in comparison with the one that use only one technique.  

Particle swarms optimization performance criteria robotic arm tuning of PID controllers

References (29)

  1. 1 Particle swarm optimization [DOI]
  2. 2 A Cooperative Approach to Particle Swarm Optimization [DOI]
  3. 3 A Particle Swarm Optimization Approach for Optimum Design of PID Controller in AVR System [DOI]
  4. 4 Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules [DOI]
  5. 5 Design of a fractional order PID controller for an AVR using particle swarm optimization [DOI]
  6. 6 An optimal fuzzy PID controller [DOI]
  7. 7 An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm [DOI]
  8. 8 Linear feedback control : analysis and design with MATLAB [DOI]
  9. 9 Optimal design of fuzzy classification systems using PSO with dynamic parameter adaptation through fuzzy logic [DOI]
  10. 10 A perturbed particle swarm algorithm for numerical optimization [DOI]
  11. 11 An improved evolutionary method with fuzzy logic for combining Particle Swarm Optimization and Genetic Algorithms [DOI]
  12. 12 PSO with Adaptive Mutation and Inertia Weight and Its Application in Parameter Estimation of Dynamic Systems [DOI]
  13. 13 Particle swarm optimization with preference order ranking for multi-objective optimization [DOI]
  14. 14 Training product unit networks using cooperative particle swarm optimisers [DOI]
  15. 15 A Review of the Applications of Bio-inspired Flower Pollination Algorithm [DOI]
  16. 16 Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization Based Cascade Interval Type 2 Fuzzy PD Controller for Rotary Inverted Pendulum System [DOI]
  17. 17 Particle Swarm Optimization and Hill Climbing for the bandwidth minimization problem [DOI]
  18. 18 Adaptive PSO-based self-tuning PID controller for ultrasonic motor
  19. 19 A comparative study of stochastic optimization methods in electric motor design [DOI]
  20. 20 Tuning fuzzy PID controllers using ant colony optimization [DOI]
  21. 21 A Web Services Based Email Extension for Remote Monitoring of Embedded Systems [DOI]
  22. 22 Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization Design of PID Controllers [DOI]
  23. 23 Application of Chaotic Particle Swarm Optimization to PID Parameter Tuning in Ball and Hoop System [DOI]
  24. 24 Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for 2D Protein Folding Prediction [DOI]
  25. 25 Modeling a Controller for an Articulated Robotic Arm [DOI]
  26. 26 A comparative study of GA, PSO and APSO: Feed point optimization of a patch antenna
  27. 27 Hybrid System to Determine the Ranking of a Returning Participant in Eurovision [DOI]
  28. 28 Particle Swarm Optimization based Stroke Volume Influence on Mean Arterial Pressure
  29. 29 An analysis of particle swarm optimizers

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

30

Page views

0

PDF downloads

17

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.