Comparison of ThinPrep® and Conventional Preparations for Peritoneal and Pleural Cytology Smears
Nasar Yousuf Alwahaibi, Nasra Said Alnoumani, Usha Rani Bai
Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 3139–3149 · Published 2 Jun 2014
10.9734/ARRB/2014/10078Abstract
Aims: To compare the performance of ThinPrep® 5000 processor with the conventional method of preparing pleural and peritoneal smears as well as to study the possibility of replacement of the conventional method with ThinPrep® 5000 system. Methodology: Forty-one samples of serous fluid comprising 17 pleural fluids and 24 peritoneal fluids, were analyzed. Smears were prepared using ThinPrep® 5000 and conventional methods. All the slides were stained by the Pap method. Results: 98% of all cases showed monolayer architecture with minimal overlapping using ThinPrep® 5000 method. However, 73% of cells, prepared by conventional method, were either crowded, overlapped or both. In addition, the cytomorphology of cells prepared by ThinPrep® 5000 method was better preserved (61%) than those with conventional method (41%). However, conventional smears were cellular in 73% of the cases whereas with ThinPrep® 5000 method, high cellularity was only seen in 2%. Conclusion: The findings of this study support the use of ThinPrep® 5000 system in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal samples.
Cited by 12
S. S. Sabitha Rani, Immadi Sudhakar Vamshidhar, Nitin Ashok John · Journal of Cytology · 2022
Takahiro NAKANISHI, Gen SATO, Masako ITOYAMA · The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology · 2019
Related research
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
12
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.