Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Comparison of ThinPrep® and Conventional Preparations for Peritoneal and Pleural Cytology Smears

Nasar Yousuf Alwahaibi, Nasra Said Alnoumani, Usha Rani Bai

Annual Research & Review in Biology · pp. 3139–3149 · Published 2 Jun 2014

10.9734/ARRB/2014/10078

Abstract

Aims: To compare the performance of ThinPrep® 5000 processor with the conventional method of preparing pleural and peritoneal smears as well as to study the possibility of replacement of the conventional method with ThinPrep® 5000 system. Methodology: Forty-one samples of serous fluid comprising 17 pleural fluids and 24 peritoneal fluids, were analyzed. Smears were prepared using ThinPrep® 5000 and conventional methods. All the slides were stained by the Pap method. Results: 98% of all cases showed monolayer architecture with minimal overlapping using ThinPrep® 5000 method. However, 73% of cells, prepared by conventional method, were either crowded, overlapped or both. In addition, the cytomorphology of cells prepared by ThinPrep® 5000 method was better preserved (61%) than those with conventional method (41%). However, conventional smears were cellular in 73% of the cases whereas with ThinPrep® 5000 method, high cellularity was only seen in 2%. Conclusion: The findings of this study support the use of ThinPrep® 5000 system in the diagnosis of pleural and peritoneal samples.

Conventional method cytology liquid-based cytology peritoneal fluid pleural fluid ThinPrep® technique.

Cited by 12

Diagnosis of Pleural Fluid Effusions by Cell Block and Pleural Biopsy – A Comparative Study

S. S. Sabitha Rani, Immadi Sudhakar Vamshidhar, Nitin Ashok John · Journal of Cytology · 2022

Comparative analyses between conventional Papanicolaou smear method and the liquid based SurePath method in body cavity fluid cytology

Takahiro NAKANISHI, Gen SATO, Masako ITOYAMA · The Journal of the Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology · 2019

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

12

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.