Labour Pain Perception and Management Experiences among Postpartum Women in Urban-Periurban Primary Healthcare Settings in Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study
Ikukaiwe, Juliet Nkechi, Enyindah, Cosmos, Ihudiebube-Splendor, Chikaodili
Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health · pp. 203–216 · Published 26 Feb 2026
10.9734/ajrnh/2026/v9i1268Abstract
Background: Labour pain represents one of the most severe acute pain experiences in obstetrics, profoundly affecting maternal satisfaction, psychological well-being, and postpartum recovery. In urban-periurban primary healthcare settings, where advanced analgesia options are limited, pain perception and management are influenced by physiological mechanisms, obstetric interventions, socio-demographic factors, and deficiencies in access and supportive care. Aims: This cross-sectional study investigated labour pain perception and management experiences among postpartum women in primary healthcare centres in Obio/Akpor, Rivers State, Nigeria. Methods: A descriptive survey design was adopted, targeting postpartum women aged 15–49 years who had vaginal deliveries within three months prior to data collection. Using the Taro Yamane formula, 393 participants were sampled from six facilities via simple random balloting (n = 393). Data were gathered through a structured questionnaire adapted from validated instruments, with test-retest reliability index of 0.82. The instrument was used to assess socio-demographic characteristics and study main variables. Data obtained were analysed in Statistical Product and Services Solution (SPSS) version 27 using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Non-pharmacological methods were rated not effective at all by 46.1% of participants, and only 1.0% rated them very effective. Pharmacological approaches were rated moderately effective by 60.3% of participants, while very high effectiveness was uncommon. Overall, 50.9% rated provider-led pain management as moderately effective, while 39.2% disagreed that pain relief was readily accessible. Pentazocine injections were most recommended, 55.0%, while epidural analgesia was rarely recommended, 2.0%. Experiences were mixed: 39.9% agreed or strongly agreed that they had a very good experience, 50.1% disagreed or strongly disagreed, yet 82.9% agreed that providers were attentive and supportive. Perceived effectiveness of labour pain relief had a statistically significant relationship with marital status (p = .001) and pain relief method (p = .027), as well as religion, education, and parity (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Findings underscore constrained access, opioid reliance, and suboptimal benefits from non-pharmacological strategies in the study area. Enhancing multimodal protocols, caregiver competencies in supportive care, and equitable analgesia provision is imperative for advancing woman-centred intrapartum practices.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- First Trimester Fasting Blood Glucose as a Screening Tool for Diabetes Mellitus in a Teaching Hospital Setting in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- The Nature and Complications of Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury in a University Hospital in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Musculoskeletal Complications of Sickle Cell Anaemia and Their Management Approaches in Makurdi, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Radiologists in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- The Skills of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Some Professional and Student Teachers Compared — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.