A Review of Psychosocial Models for the Development of Musculoskeletal Disorders and Common Psychosocial Instruments
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 9–19 · Published 6 Nov 2020
10.9734/acri/2020/v20i730207Abstract
Aims: While the biomechanical factors causing musculoskeletal disorder (MSDs) are well defined, the psychosocial dimension of MSDs is complex and affected by personal, organizational and environmental elements. There is an impetus to understand how psychosocial risk factors contribute to the manifestation of MSDs and systematically present the strengths and constraints of various instruments in assessing psychosocial risk factors. Study Design: This article critically reviews various models linking psychosocial constructs to MSDs and various instruments for evaluating psychosocial risk factors. Methodology: This article reviews the most pertinent literature which presents and discusses the connection of psychosocial domains with the development of MSDs as well as the common instruments used for evaluation of psychosocial factors. Results: It shows an intricate connection between psychosocial and biomechanical aspects compounded by organizational, individual and environmental factors. Psychosocial factors particularly psychological demand, decisional latitude, level of social support and work organization result in stress which produces strain and physiological deterioration hence MSDs. Different psychosocial risk factors have also been found to evoke MSDs in different body parts. Overarching cognitive and psychological aspects consisting of work demands, maneuver margins and work recognition have also been proposed in examining the psychosocial dimension of MSDs. Instruments for measuring psychological constructs are often subjective and rely on personal reflections. Some instruments assess multiple psychosocial factors while other assess specific attributes. There instruments share a common shortcoming of treating risk factors across different workplaces as homogenous. Conclusion: Refinement of the instruments and development of sector-specific instruments are beneficial for more reliable evaluation of psychosocial risk factors.
Cited by 7
Mª Jesús López-González, Eva González-Menéndez, Silvia González · International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics · 2021
Saeid Yazdanirad, Mahnaz Shakerian, Amir Hossein Khoshakhlagh · WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation · 2025
Deividson Sá Fernandes de Souza, Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva, João Vítor de Oliveira Santos · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · 2021
Joabe Mikael Rocha e Silva Nascimento, Lucas Gomes Miranda Bispo, Jonhatan Magno Norte da Silva · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · 2024
Matthias Kalmring · MSK – Muskuloskelettale Physiotherapie · 2024
Javier Andrés Mancilla-Aliste · EID. Ergonomía, Investigación y Desarrollo · 2024
Wendy Macdonald, Jodi Oakman · Applied Ergonomics · 2022
Related research
- Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Radiologists in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Factor Analysis on the Incidence of Musculoskeletal Disorders at the University of Dschang — shares topic coverage
- The Role of Neck Muscle Strength and Posture in Digital Device-related Visual Disturbances: A Scoping Review — shares topic coverage
- Current Clinical Status of Osteopathy: Study Based on Retrospective Evidences of Six Years, A Systemic Review — shares topic coverage
- The Effect of Three-Month Therapeutic and Ergonomic Exercise Based on Virtual Space on Musculoskeletal Disorder in Computer Users — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
7
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.