Knowledge, Awareness and Acceptance of Labor Analgesia among Antenatal Women in a Remote Island: A Questionnaire Based Study
Avinash Prakash, Anita Yadav, Habib Md Reazaul Karim, Sarasa Kumar Sahoo, Pinky Jena, Kumar Aman
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1–7 · Published 31 May 2017
10.9734/BJMMR/2017/33980Abstract
Background: It has been a decade since the year 2007 was dedicated towards painless motherhood. However the use and acceptance of labor analgesia is still very rare in developing countries. Objective: The present study was aimed to assess the knowledge, acceptance and reasons for rejection of labor analgesia among the expectant mothers. Methods: The present observational study was conducted after approval from the institute. All antenatal women who attended antenatal clinic were approached during January to March 2017. Data was collected from the consented women using a pretested questionnaire. Data were expressed in absolute numbers and percentage scale. Measures of central tendencies were calculated for quantitative data using INSTAT software and p < 0.05 was considered significant for comparison. Results: Response from 280 women with mean ± SD age and gestational age of 25.49 ± 4.89 years and 28.25 ± 8.75 weeks respectively were analyzed. 126 were primi or multiparous; 56 graded labor pain as unbearable yet only 30 (23.81%) wanted labor analgesia. Only 20 (7.14%) prospective mothers were having knowledge of labor analgesia. The nulliparous wanted significantly less labor analgesia compared to primi and multiparous (p 0.003). Desire to bear natural birth was the commonest reason to refuse painless labor. One quarter of the participants believed that labor analgesia was bad for child and against the will of God. Conclusion: Knowledge and acceptance of labor analgesia is poor although women who had previous experience were significantly more inclined towards it. Misinformation and myths is also a major contributor for non acceptance of labor analgesia.
Cited by 10
10 citations reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Is Caesarean Delivery Safe? Experience from a Low Resource Setting — shares topic coverage
- The Utility of Mid-Pelvic Dimensions Via Plain Radiography in Predicting Cesarean Delivery — shares topic coverage
- Risk Factors of Genital Tract Lacerations at Yaoundé Central Hospital - Cameroon: A Case Control Study — shares topic coverage
- Knowledge and Attitude among Pregnant Women towards Caesarean Section at Tamale Teaching Hospital in the Northern Region of Ghana — shares topic coverage
- Acute Intestinal Obstruction in the Post Partum Perioda Case Report — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
10
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.