Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Detection of Non-Normality in Data Sets and Comparison between Different Normality Tests

Emmanuel O. Biu, Maureen T. Nwakuya, Nduka Wonu

Asian Journal of Probability and Statistics · pp. 1–20 · Published 4 Jan 2020

10.9734/ajpas/2019/v5i430149

Abstract

The paper provides five tests of data normality at different sample sizes. The tests are the Shapiro-Wilk (SW) test, Anderson-Darling (AD) test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test, Ryan-Joiner (RJ) test, and Jarque-Bera (JB) test. These tests were used to test for normality for two secondary data sets with sample size (155) for large and (40) for small; and then test the simulated scenario with standard normal “N(0,1)” data sets; where the large samples of sizes (150, 140, 130, 130, 110 and 100) and small samples of sizes (40. 35, 30, 25, 20, 15 and 10) are considered at two levels of significance (5% and 10%). However, the aim of this paper is to detect and compare the performance of the different normality tests considered. The normality test results shows Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) test is a most powerful test than other tests since it detect the simulated large sample data sets do not follow a normal distribution at 5%, while for small sample sizes at 5% level of significance; the results showed the Jarque-Bera (JB) test is a most powerful test than other tests since it detects that the simulated small sample data do not follow a normal distribution at 5%. This paper recommended JB test for normality test when the sample size is small and KS test when the sample size is large at 5% level of significance.

Normality test differenced simulated scenario (samples) level of significance large and small sample (observation).

Cited by 17

BELIEFS-ATTITUDES AND JOB MOTIVATION PREDICTING DEVELOPMENTALLY APPROPRIATE VISUAL ARTS AMONG PRIVATE PRESCHOOL TEACHERS IN SELANGOR

Heng-Lan Teng, F. Hutagalung, Fong-Peng Chew · International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling · 2026

Univariate normality checking practices in L2 research: An AI-assisted systematic review

Vahid Aryadoust, Yichen Jia · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · 2026

Discovery Learning and Mathematical Problem-Solving: Evidence from Elementary Education Classrooms

Dinda Nuriyah Syifah, D. Maharbid · Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika · 2025

AI-Driven Warehouse Networks: Integrating Probabilistic Forecasting with Dynamic Allocation

Yi-Fan Wu, Yu-Chen Sun, Wenhao Zhao · 2025 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data and Algorithms (CAIBDA) · 2025

Behavioral Addiction and Student Well being: Examining the Mental Health Impact of Social Media

Zelynda Zeinab Malizal · Sinergi International Journal of Psychology · 2025

Exploring Predictive Modeling for Food Quality Enhancement: A Case Study on Wine

Cemil Emre Yavas, Jongyeop Kim, Lei Chen · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · 2025

Time token model and wordwall interactive game in learning: effectiveness on communication and collaboration skills

A. Alonemarera, E. Ernawati, Syamsul Syamsul · JPBIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi) · 2023

Causality between residential electricity consumption and explanatory factors

Serge Guefano, M. Bozorg, Mauro Carpita · Energy Strategy Reviews · 2023

Usage Bingo Review in History Learning to Improve Student Learning Outcomes

Annisa Annisa, I. Irayanti · Diniyyah Jurnal · 2023

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

17

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.