Heterosis in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) for Yield and Yield Component Traits
Desalegn Negasa Soresa, Gomathi Nayagam, Netsanet Bacha, Zerihun Jaleta
Advances in Research · pp. 141–152 · Published 3 Sep 2020
10.9734/air/2020/v21i930242Abstract
Estimates of heterosis for F1 hybrids over mid and better parent were computed for traits that showed significant differences between genotypes on analysis of variance. Heterosis for yield components and yield was studied using 8x8 half diallel cross in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The heterosis for yield was generally accompanied by heterosis for yield components. Heterosis for marketable fruit yield per plant ranged from (-63.4%) (P3xP8) to (33.8%) (P6xP8) and (-62.5%) (P3xP8) to (52.6%) (P5xP7), for mid parent and better parent respectively. Significant heterosis over better and mid-parent was observed for all the traits. Best parent and Mid-parent heterosis (MPH) was highest and in desirable direction for number of marketable fruit per plant (29.3%; 29.2%) in crosses ( P3xP6 for both ) and pericarp thickness (46.3%; 57.6%) in crosses (P2xP6 and P4xP8), number of fruit cluster per plant (32.8%; 35.9%) in cross (P3xP6 for both), individual fruit weight (36.1%; 41.2%) in cross (P2xP8, P3xP5) and fruit diameter (28.4%; 28.3%) in cross (P3xP5; P2xP6), fruit length (23.07%; 20.4%) in cross (P2xP6 for both). Out of 28 F1 crosses, positive and desirable heterosis by 10 crosses over better parent and 17 crosses over mid-parent were observed for total fruit density in tomato. An important heterosis both in heterobeltiosis and mid-parent was recorded in marketable fruit yield in ton per hectare. From all the crosses, seven crosses revealed positive from which three crosses are the most important P2xP7 (31%), P3xP5 (20%) and P3xP6 (54%) in better parent heterosis. Similarly for mid-parent heterosis, only ten crosses out of 28 reveled positive while the rest 18 crosses showed the undesirable direction for marketable fruit yield indicating majority of the hybrids exhibited unfavorable heterotic response and only a few hybrids could be considered for selection.
Cited by 5
S.I. Kondratenko, O.P. Samovol, Z.P. Linnik · Vegetable and Melon Growing · 2026
Bassim Almass Essa, Othman Khalid Alwan · Agronomía Mesoamericana · 2024
Tamene Haile, Desalegn Negasa Soresa, Alemu Hailu · International Journal of Agronomy · 2026
Olajoju Lola OLADOKUN, Dolapo Olalekan IBIRINDE, Adesike Oladoyin KOLAWOLE · Acta agriculturae Slovenica · 2022
P. Mohanty, S. Pramanik, S. Sengupta · International Journal of Vegetable Science · 2023
Related research
- Growth and Yield of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) as Affected by Hydroponics, Greenhouse and Irrigation Regimes — shares topic coverage
- Agronomic Behavior of Six Saladette Tomato Hybrids Grown under Shade Mesh — shares topic coverage
- Field Suppression of Fusarium Soil Borne Diseases of Tomato Plants by the Combined Application of Bio Agents and Chitosan — shares topic coverage
- Identification of Lines of Tomato Resistant to Bacterial Wilt — shares topic coverage
- Assesment of the Yield Components of Two Tomato Varieties (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) in Hydroponics in Côte d'Ivoire — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
5
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.