Assessment of Student Nurses’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices on Antimicrobial Resistance
Quinn N. Cabuguason, Tristan Roi T. Malones, Chaudhry Haris Tasnim D. Akhtar, Gabriela B. Espino, Karla Victoria S. Jinon, KC Rendaje, Edyn Michael Suganob
Asian Journal of Research in Nursing and Health · pp. 691–702 · Published 16 Apr 2026
10.9734/ajrnh/2026/v9i1309Abstract
Aims: To assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of student nurses regarding antimicrobial resistance and determine the relationships among these variables. Study Design: Descriptive–correlational research design with a cross-sectional approach. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in a private nursing college in Iloilo City during the School Year 2025–2026. Methodology: A total of 305 second-, third-, and fourth-year nursing students were selected using stratified random sampling to ensure proportional representation. Data were gathered through an adopted, validated, and reliable questionnaire composed of four parts: demographic profile, knowledge, attitudes, and practices on antimicrobial resistance. A pilot test was conducted to establish reliability using Cronbach’s alpha. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices scores were categorized as poor, moderate, or good based on predefined percentage ranges to ensure clear interpretation of results. Ethical approval and informed consent were secured prior to data collection. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test assessed normality. Since the data were not normally distributed, Spearman’s rho was used to determine relationships among variables at a 0.05 level of significance. Results: Out of 305 respondents, the majority were female (77.4%) and fourth-year students (35.4%). Student nurses demonstrated generally good knowledge (mean score was 12.6 out of 16), with 96.67% correctly identifying antibiotics and 96.07% recognizing that improper self-medication contributes to antimicrobial resistance. The overall mean attitude score was 3.88 (SD = 0.85), reflecting positive attitudes, while the overall mean practice score was 3.85 (SD = 1.21), indicating generally appropriate practices. Spearman’s rho analysis revealed a weak but significant relationship between knowledge and attitudes (rs = 0.125, p = 0.029) and between knowledge and practices (rs = 0.271, p < 0.001). A moderate positive relationship was found between attitudes and practices (rs = 0.394, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The study concludes that student nurses demonstrate good knowledge and positive attitudes toward antimicrobial resistance; however, gaps remain in translating knowledge into consistent practices. Strengthening antimicrobial stewardship, nursing education, and clinical training is recommended to promote responsible antibiotic use.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Knowledge of Birth Preparedness and Complications Readiness: An Urban- Rural Comparison of Maternal and Child Health Clinic Attendees in Anambra State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Knowledge and Safety Practices Related to Exposure to Physical and Chemical Hazards among Welders in Sokoto, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Food Hygiene Knowledge, Practice and Safety Training Intervention among Food Handlers in Abakaliki, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Knowledge, Perception and Practice of Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness among Pregnant Women Attending a Tertiary Healthcare Facility in Sokoto, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- A Questionnaire Study of Food – Drug Interactions to Assess Knowledge of People from Diverse Backgrounds — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.