A Recommendation for Classical and Robust Factor Analysis
Ying-Ying Zhang, Teng-Zhong Rong, Man-Man Li
Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science · pp. 1–15 · Published 18 Mar 2017
10.9734/BJMCS/2017/31936Abstract
Considering the factor analysis methods (classical or robust), the data input (data or scaled data), and the running matrix (covariance or correlation) all together, there are 8 combinations. The objective of the study is to give a recommendation for classical and robust factor analysis. First, when the variables have different units, it is common to standardize the variables, and thus it is common to use the correlation matrix as the running matrix. Second, we need to explain the factors from the loading matrix. The entries of the loading matrix from the sample covariance matrix are not limited between 0 and 1, which makes the explanations of the factors hard. Third, we may not be able to compute the robust covariance matrix, and thus the robust correlation matrix of the original data, as the stocks data example illustrates. Consequently, we recommend classical and robust factor analysis using the correlation matrix of the scaled data as the running matrix for theoretical and computational reasons. The hbk data and the stock611 data illustrate our recommendation.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Never Trust Anyone: Trust-Privacy Trade-offs in Vehicular Ad-Hoc Networks — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.