Combining Housing Price Forecasts Generated Separately by Hedonic and Artificial Neural Network Models
Salvatore Joseph Terregrossa, Mohammed Hussein Ibadi
Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting · pp. 130–148 · Published 13 Feb 2021
10.9734/ajeba/2021/v21i130345Abstract
Aims: A) To enhance accuracy in forecasting housing unit prices by forming combinations of component forecasts generated separately by hedonic and artificial neural network models; B) To help ascertain whether a constrained or unconstrained linear combining model achieves superior forecasting performance. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Business Administration, Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul 34295, Turkey; from 2019 to 2020. Study Design: A cross sectional data set of housing unit prices and corresponding housing unit attributes and characteristics is formed and then randomly divided into two segments: in sample (80%) and out of sample (20%). Three different methods (hedonic, artificial neural network and combining) are then employed to process the same in sample data set, and generate out of sample forecasts. The three forecasting methods are then tested and compared. Methodology: Out of sample combination forecasts are formed with component forecast weights generated by in sample weighted least squares (WLS) regression of realized price against in sample component forecasts. Four types of regressions are run: unconstrained, with and without a constant; constrained, with and without a constant. Then the mean absolute forecast error of each forecasting method is calculated and the mean difference in absolute forecast error between all pairs of models are compared and tested with a nonparametric Wilcoxon sign rank test. Results: The combining model formed with component forecast weights generated by weighted least squares (WLS) regression with the constant term suppressed and the sum-of-the-coefficients constrained to equal one, generally performs the best, in comparison with all other forecasting models (component and combination) examined in the study. Conclusion: The findings represent further evidence regarding the benefits of applying constraints on the linear combining forecast model; and demonstrate that a constrained linear combining model can be a successful technique for enhancing the forecast accuracy of housing unit prices.
Cited by 31
Xiaojie Xu, Yun Zhang · Decision Analytics Journal · 2023
Xiaojie Xu, Yun Zhang · Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management · 2022
Xiaojie Xu, Yun Zhang · Journal of Property Research · 2021
Fons Wijnhoven, Nathan De Bruijn, Robin Effing · 2023
Jose Torres-Pruñonosa, Pablo García-Estévez, Josep Maria Raya · Sage Open · 2022
Salvatore Joseph Terregrossa, Uğur Şener · Cogent Economics & Finance · 2023
Bingzi Jin, Xiaojie Xu · Economics Open · 2025
Anders Hjort, Johan Pensar, Ida Scheel · Journal of Property Research · 2022
Zhikun Luo, College of Foundation Science, Harbin University of Commerce, Harbin 150028, Heilongjiang, China · AIMS Mathematics · 2025
Bingzi Jin, Xiaojie Xu · Neural Computing and Applications · 2024
Showing 20 of 31 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Factors Driving Farm Gate Price of Tomatoes in Ghana: An Application of Hedonic Model — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
31
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.