Assessment in Higher Education: A Critical Review of a Masters-Level Module’s Assessment Procedures
Asian Journal of Language, Literature and Culture Studies · pp. 11–18 · Published 24 Mar 2020
Abstract
This paper presents a brief evaluation of a Masters-level module taught in a number of UK universities within language and linguistics departments. It will illuminate the underlying rationale for the module’s assessment procedures in assessing students’ learning; aiming not only for description and explanation, but for evaluation. Furthermore, in connection with assessment literature, issues of validity and reliability of the module’s assessment will also be discussed. To end with, suggestions which may improve the assessment procedures of the module under study will be presented, before a conclusion is drawn up.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Anxiety and Visual Field Assessment Reliability in Glaucoma Patients — shares topic coverage
- Home Recording And Video Selection: Their use In A Low-Resource Setting For Epilepsy Diagnosis — shares topic coverage
- A study on Clinical Validity and Reliability of the Bengali Language Translated Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (GERD-QOL) in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients — shares topic coverage
- Reliability of the General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire among Head Teachers from Schools in Uganda — shares topic coverage
- Validity and Reliability of Combination of Observed Practice with Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in Midwifery Final Exam — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.