Growth Performance of Albino Rats Fed Graded Levels of Baobab (Adansonia digitata) Leaf Meal
Abdul-Rahaman Saibu Salifu, Ayimbire Abonuusum, Joseph Kinansua Laary
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 1–7 · Published 18 Nov 2016
10.9734/ACRI/2016/29169Abstract
Aims: The study was conducted to determine the possible use of baobab leaf meal (BLM) as a feed ingredient in livestock feeding and its effects on growth performance of the animals. Study Design: Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was used for the study. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Ecological Agriculture, Bolgatanga Polytechnic, Bolgatanga. The experiment lasted for four weeks. Methodology: Sixteen individually-housed albino weanling rats of about six weeks old were fed with four levels of BLM inclusion in the diet. The four levels of BLM in the diets were the control (0%), 10%, 15% and 20% for T0, T1, T2 and T3 respectively. Each treatment was replicated four times, with a rat representing a replicate. Feed and water were given ad-libitum and growth performance monitored during the four-week period. The data were analyzed using the General Analysis of Variance. Least significant difference was also used to separate treatment means at 5%. Results: The results showed significant differences (P=.05) between levels of BLM in diet on rats weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion efficiency. The rats fed on the control (T0) diet significantly (P=.05) grew better, compared to those fed with BLM-based diets (T1, T2 and T3). The values for mean weight gain were 59.7, 42.3, 33.3 and 33.3 g for T0, T1, T2 and T3 respectively. In respect to feed intake, the mean total feed intake values were 399.0, 314.0, 327.0, and 313.0 g with corresponding mean daily feed intake of 14.24, 11.21, 11.69 and 11.19 g for T0, T1, T2 and T3 respectively. The mean feed conversion efficiency was better compared to test diets (T1-T3). For the carcass parameters, the mean weights of viscera, respiratory tract, full stomach, heart, kidney, spleen, liver and full gastrointestinal tract were not influenced (P = .05) by the dietary treatments. Conclusion: The inclusion of baobab leaf meal in rat diet could negatively affect their growth performance, especially with regard to their weight gain. In places where other plant-based feed sources are scarce, very low inclusion rates of not more than 10% of BLM in diets may be considered, provided animal weight gain is not the primary objective of the farmer.
Cited by 3
Oyegoke Rukayat Abiodun, Aminat Abebi Abdulwahab, Musa Fasilat Jumoke · Science Journal of University of Zakho · 2025
Sor-Aniabari Ruth Baradum, D. Peters, R. Ohiri · European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences · 2022
Y. Mhlomi, G. Otunola, A. Afolayan · Current Nutrition & Food Science · 2019
Related research
- Effect of Cashew Kernel and Soya Bean Oils on Blood Serum Cholesterol and Triglyceride of Albino Rats (Rattus rattus) — shares topic coverage
- Effects of Eruca sativa Leaves Extracts on Testes, Fertility Potential and Testosterone Concentration in Male Rats — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Maize (Zea mays) with Soybean (Glycine max) and Moringa (Moringa oleifera) on Blood Biochemical Profile of Albino Rats — shares topic coverage
- Growth, Body Composition and Resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila Challenge in Juvenile African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) Fed Diets Supplemented with Spirulina (Arthrospira platensis) — shares topic coverage
- Effects of Date Pits on Performance, Carcass Quality and Nutrient Digestibility of Baladi Goat Kids — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
3
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.