Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assess the Knowledge & Identify the Existing Practice of ANM Regarding Assessment of Growth & Development of under 5 Years Children & its Contributing Factors

Soma Dutta

Asian Journal of Medicine and Health · pp. 17–21 · Published 16 May 2022

10.9734/ajmah/2022/v20i930484

Abstract

The investigator conducted a descriptive study to assess the knowledge, existing practices of assessment of growth and development of under five children and its contributing factors in selected sub-centres of district Hooghly in West Bengal. The conceptual framework was based on “Fishbone” diagram of Kaoru Ishikawa. Sixty Auxiliary Nurse Midwife (ANMs) as samples by non- probability convenient sampling technique were used to collect data. A valid and reliable structured knowledge questionnaire, structured observation checklist were used for data collection. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. The result revealed that the ANM scored 65.93% knowledge score and 82.22% practice score respectively. The contributing factors like unavailability of equipments (65%), lack of man power (25%), lack of interest, lack of in-service programme (85%) expressed by ANM emerged from the study. The study has implications in different fields of nursing practice, nursing administration, nursing research. On the basis of the findings some recommendations were made for future studies.

Growth & development under 5 children knowledge practice auxiliary nurse midwives (ANMs)

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.