Innovations in Drug-Coated Balloons and Stentless Coronary Interventions: Evaluating the Evidence, Limitations, and Future Prospects in De-Novo Lesion Management
George Davidson, Nwachukwu O. Nwachukwu, Chimaobi Nwevo, Ahmed Ismail Ali, Nwamaka C. Bob-Ume, Abduljabbar A. Abdulaziz, Adu Agyen Kwame, Muhiyadin S. Ali, Alexander C. Ogbodo, Obinna D. Nwaizuzu
Cardiology and Angiology: An International Journal · pp. 56–68 · Published 13 Jul 2026
10.9734/ca/2026/v15i3553Abstract
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality, and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is central to the management of obstructive coronary disease. Although drug-eluting stents (DESs) have reduced restenosis and repeat revascularisation, their permanent metallic structure is associated with persistent concerns, including chronic vascular inflammation, impaired vasomotion, delayed healing, neoatherosclerosis, stent thrombosis and difficulties during future revascularisation. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) provide a stentless approach by delivering an antiproliferative agent to the vessel wall during balloon inflation without leaving a permanent scaffold. This narrative review evaluates the evidence, limitations and future prospects of DCB-based coronary intervention for de novo coronary artery lesions. Contemporary randomised trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, pooled analyses and expert reviews were examined, with emphasis on clinical outcomes, angiographic findings, lesion preparation, device-related considerations and long-term safety. The reviewed evidence indicates that DCBs can achieve clinical and angiographic outcomes broadly comparable to those of DESs in appropriately selected patients, particularly in small-vessel coronary artery disease. Three-year and longer-term analyses also suggest similar rates of major adverse cardiovascular events, target lesion revascularisation and cardiac mortality in selected populations. Emerging evidence supports possible use in selected large-vessel lesions, although this indication is less established. The principal advantage of DCB therapy is its leave-nothing-behind strategy, which preserves native vessel architecture and avoids complications related to permanent implants. However, outcomes depend strongly on adequate lesion preparation, careful patient selection and device-specific performance. Current evidence supports DCB-based stentless intervention as a maturing revascularisation strategy for selected de novo lesions, while further standardised trials are required to define its role in complex anatomy and acute coronary syndromes.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- STEMI as the Initial Presentation of Polyarteritis Nodosa Associated with Hepatitis B: A Rare Cardiovascular Manifestation — shares topic coverage
- Meta-analysis of Trials Comparing Drug-eluting Stents with Bare Metal Stents: Safety and Efficacy — shares topic coverage
- Oxidative Stress Biomarkers (Malondialdehyde, Superoxide Dismutase, and Catalase) as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Review — shares topic coverage
- - 251 A/T Single Nucleotide Polymorphism of Interleukin 8 and Susceptibility to Acute Myocardial Infarction — shares topic coverage
- The Relation of Vitamin D Status and Presence of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.