Evaluation of Bupivacaine Co-administration with Midazolam or Neostigmine in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia Surgery-A Randomized Clinical Trial Study
Jarahzadeh Mohammad Hossein, Vaziribozorg Sedighe, Heiranizadeh Najmeh, Dehghani Mohammad Hossein
Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 1–6 · Published 23 Sep 2016
10.9734/BJMMR/2016/27029Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of midazolam and neostigmine co-administration with bupivacaine in pediatric inguinal hernia surgery. Study Design: Randomized, double-blinded clinical study. Place and Duration of Study: Departments of Anesthesiology, Head and Neck Surgery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran, between 2012 and 2014. Methodology: In this double blinded randomized clinical trial study, 90 pediatric patients aged 1-5 years undergoing inguinal hernia surgery were randomly assigned in to 3 groups. Group A received bupivacaine with placebo. Group B received caudal block with bupivacaine co-administrated with 50 µgr/kg midazolam. Group C received bupivacaine co-administered with neostigmine 2 µgr/kg. The hemodynamic variables were recorded at the baseline and interoperation. The pain score, sedation score, nausea/vomiting and analgesic use were recorded in the recovery phase and after 24 hours too. Results: Baseline and intraoperative hemodynamic variables such as heart rate and blood pressure were compared between three groups. After 24 hours the pain score and sedation were not different. The anesthesia side effects like nausea and vomiting were the same between the three groups. In recovery room pain and sedation were significantly better in midazolam group (B). Also the analgesic use between group A and B, was different during 24 hours after operation. The most analgesic dose were used in Bupivacaine with Placebo (A) and the least in midazolam group (B). Our findings demonstrated that pain score in midazolam and neostigmine group was less than bupivacaine group and sedation score was higher in midazolam and neostigmine group. After 24 hours the pain score and sedation were not different. The anesthesia side effects like nausea and vomiting were the same in three groups. Analgesic use was significantly higher in bupivacaine group compare with other two groups. Conclusion: From the results, midazolam and neostigmine would be appropriate adjuncts to bupivacaine in caudal block during pediatric surgeries.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- A Prospective Study Comparing 0.25% Bupivacaine and 0.375% Ropivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery — shares topic coverage
- Measurement of the Outcome of Low Dose of 0.5% Bupivacaine Heavy in Spinal Anesthesia during Lower Segment Cesarean Section (LSCS) — shares topic coverage
- Postoperative Pain Relief Following Bupivacaine Injection in Sites & Intraperitoneal Spray of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Dexamethasone Addition to Local Anesthetics in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block — shares topic coverage
- The Administration of Spinal or Local Anesthesia in Anal Fissure and Hemorrhoidectomy: A Comparative Literature Review — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.