Learning Styles and Critical Thinking among Undergraduates of University of Port Harcourt
Goodness Wobihiele Orluwene, Dorathy Sunday
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 56–64 · Published 14 Mar 2020
10.9734/acri/2020/v20i130178Abstract
The study was based on the prediction of critical thinking using learning styles. It was guided by two research questions and two null hypotheses. A sample of 393 third years undergraduates selected from four faculties in the University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria was used for the study. Data was collected from two adopted instruments tagged Cornell Critical Thinking Test (CCTT) Level Z and the Learning Style Questionnaire (LSQ). The face validation of the two instruments was conducted by three experts in Measurement and Evaluation. Reliability analysis of the CCTT using Kuder-Richardson 20 yielded a coefficient of 0.81, while the LSQ had a split-half coefficient of 0.77. Data were analyzed using stepwise multiple regression analysis. Result obtained indicated that pragmatist and reflector learning styles were significant predictors of critical thinking while theorist and activist were not significant predictors. Based on these results, appropriate recommendations and conclusions were drawn.
Cited by 1
Xufeng Chen · Research in Science & Technological Education · 2025
Related research
- The Impact of Mathematics Anxiety on the Mathematical Value of Secondary School Students in Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- When Grad Students Adopt Technology Applications: An Exploratory Study in a Virtual Learning Environment — shares topic coverage
- Study on Cultivating Critical Thinking Ability in BTI in China-Taking English Reading Class as Example — shares topic coverage
- Comparative Analysis of In-service and Pre-service Teachers’ Critical Thinking Skills; A Thematic Approach Based on the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory — shares topic coverage
- Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions on Enhancing Students’ Reasoning Skills in Mathematics — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.