Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

A Comparative Economic Assessment of Certified Organic (Traditional and HYV) Rice and Inorganic Rice Cultivation in Pudukkottai District of Tamil Nadu, India

M. Vinoth, L. Umamaheswari, K. R. Karunakaran, A. Pouchepparadjou, N. Swaminathan, S. Parthasarathi, C. Aroutselvam

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 181–190 · Published 19 Aug 2026

10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i94450

Abstract

Aim: Rice is a critical crop for a nation's food security. The study estimated the costs and returns, production function, resource-use efficiency, and constraints in certified organic traditional, certified organic HYV, and inorganic rice cultivation using primary data collected from 100 rice farmers in the study area. Analytical tools such as fixed- and variable-cost concepts, the Cobb-Douglas production function, the Marginal Value Product: Marginal Factor Cost (MVP/MFC) ratio, and Garrett’s ranking technique were used. Place and Duration of the Study: Pudukkottai district, a rice-growing region located in the Cauvery Delta Zone of Tamil Nadu, was purposively chosen as the study area. Primary data were obtained from rice farmers during February-March 2026 using a pre-tested and structured interview schedule. The duration of the study was six months. Results: Marginal and small farmers constituted 80 per cent of the sample, indicating the prevalence of small-scale rice farming among the sample farms. Human labour and machinery were major components of the total cost of rice cultivation. Returns per rupee of investment were higher for traditional rice (1.42), followed by organic HYV (1.25) and inorganic rice (1.15). Production function analysis revealed that organic inputs and machinery had a positive and significant influence on organic rice yield, whereas seed, neem seed kernel extract, irrigation, and machinery had a positive and significant influence in inorganic rice farms. The constraints reported by farmers were low yield of organic rice, high cost of weeding, and lack of quality seeds in both traditional and organic HYV rice cultivation, whereas pest and disease incidence, high cost of weeding, and labour scarcity were reported in inorganic rice cultivation. Conclusion: Traditional rice cultivation was more profitable than organic HYV and inorganic rice. In addition, traditional and organic HYV rice cultivation were eco-friendly alternatives for obtaining higher income and protecting soil health.

Traditional rice Organic High Yielding Variety (HYV) rice inorganic rice cost and returns cobb-douglas production function resource use efficiency constraints Garrett’s ranking

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.