Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Assessment in Higher Education: Perceptions among Stakeholders from Ghana

Frank Yao Gbadago, Alfred Morrison, Francis Donkor

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 1–18 · Published 11 May 2017

10.9734/BJESBS/2017/29093

Abstract

Formal education is considered an important means of acquiring knowledge and skills (both attitudinal and technical) for developing human capital stocks; and it increases one’s ability to understand and critique new ideas necessary for facilitating the adoption and/or modification of technology as fundamental to development, growth and poverty reduction in nations across the globe. As nations and the world at large relentlessly channel huge resources into educating their citizenry, assessment is identified as the main means of obtaining authentic feedback to improve students’ learning, teaching and educational programs at all levels. Despite the good attributes and over reliance on assessment, opinions suggest that the ability to identify good assessment techniques is not intuitive supporting the fact that there is no one best approach to assessment. Reported cases of cheating and all kinds of manipulations surrounding conduct of assessments and/or examinations in higher education (HE), together with the advent of mass enrollments at almost all levels of education, the apparent lack of equal expansion in the facilities, non-provision of adequate logistics, and the inability of authorities to properly co-ordinate and/or manage assessment processes as expected have largely accounted for the vociferous calls for review or search for alternative(s) to assessment in education worldwide, more importantly in Ghana. This study therefore sought to ascertain and analyse the perceptions of stakeholders on the assessment process in HE to determine the repercussions of such perceptions. The study involved a cross-sectional survey of students and other stakeholders in HE from the Kumasi Metropolis, Ghana. The results show that the stakeholders’ perceptions on assessment in HE largely coincided with prior studies on assessments that have served as the basis for most pedagogical instructions and educational programs.

Assessment in higher education Kumasi metropolis, Ghana, perception teaching and learning.

References (16)

  1. 1 Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests [DOI]
  2. 2 A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing : a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives
  3. 3 Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma [DOI]
  4. 4 Determinants of the Capital Structures of European SMEs [DOI]
  5. 5 Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses [DOI]
  6. 6 Action Research: Teachers as Researchers in the Classroom
  7. 7 A Framework for Junior Cycle
  8. 8 Measurement and Evaluation of Musical Experiences [DOI]
  9. 9 A Coherent and Integrated Framework Using Concept Maps for Various Educational Assessment Functions [DOI]
  10. 10 Determinants of Capital Structure: Evidence from Ghanaian Firms
  11. 11 Audit expectation gap and MBA accounting students knowledge on auditor(s) responsibilities: Evidence from a public university in Kumasi Ashanti Region of Ghana [DOI]
  12. 12 Frank Wood's Business Accounting
  13. 13 BUSINESS STATISTICS: A MULTIMEDIA GUIDE TO CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS
  14. 14 ASSESSMENT: HOW TO GET FEEDBACK TO THE STUDENTS
  15. 15 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain [DOI]
  16. 16 Education and the Education of Teachers [DOI]

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

31

Page views

0

PDF downloads

8

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.