Commercial Beekeepers Leveraging Apis mellifera (Linnaeus), for Income Generation in Himachal Pradesh, India
Tamana Rani, Surender K. Sharma, Debamitra Chatterjee, Shivani Parmar
Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology · pp. 548–554 · Published 13 Feb 2026
10.9734/jabb/2026/v29i23659Abstract
Background: Himachal Pradesh possesses a diverse range of temperate and sub-temperate flora, providing abundant nectar and pollen resources for honey bees throughout the year. The availability of rich bee floral resources such as horticultural crops, forest vegetation, and wild flowering plants creates favourable conditions for colony development and honey flow seasons. Aims: To assess the economic feasibility and profitability of commercial beekeeping using Apis mellifera (Linnaeus) in Himachal Pradesh, and to compare stationary and migratory beekeeping systems. Study Design: Survey-based descriptive study with economic feasibility analysis. Place and Duration of Study: The survey was conducted in six districts of Himachal Pradesh (Kangra, Mandi, Hamirpur, Kullu, Una and Chamba) during 2023–2024. Methodology: Data were collected from 10 commercial beekeepers per district through surveys and personal interviews. Factors such as honey production, associated by-products, market demand, costs of beekeeping setups and technical know-how were analysed to assess economic feasibility. Economic feasibility was evaluated using cost-return analysis and descriptive statistics. Comparative yield analysis was also performed between stationary and migratory beekeeping practices. Results: The findings revealed that migratory beekeeping produced higher yields (45 kg/colony/year) and greater profitability compared to stationary setups (15kg/colony/year). Economic analysis showed clear economies of scale, with net annual profits ranging from ₹38,100 for 10 colonies to ₹57,80,000 for 500 colonies, and the average establishment cost per colony decreased with an increased apiary size. The benefit-cost (B: C) ratio further supported this trend, showing low economic viability at 10 colonies (0.38), but improved profitability at 50 colonies (1.15), with maximum economic efficiency observed at 100 colonies (1.41). Although 500 colonies generated the highest gross returns, the B: C ratio slightly declined to 1.33 due to increased labour, transportation, and management expenses. Despite promising profitability, beekeepers faced challenges such as losses due to pests and diseases, the absence of organised market channels, and limited income potential. Conclusion: Commercial beekeeping in Himachal Pradesh is a highly profitable and economically viable enterprise, especially under migratory management and large-scale operations. However, improved pest management practices, technical training, and development of organised marketing and branding channels are essential to maximise income potential and sustainability.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms and Phosphorus Levels on Nutrient Availability, Uptake and Seed Yield in Inceptisol — shares topic coverage
- Response of Cotton and Soybean Intercropping System to Integrated Nutrient Management — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Different Substrates and Mother Cultures on Yield and Yield Attributes of Oyster Mushroom (Pleurotus ostreatus) — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Different Kinds of Substrates on the Growth and Yield Performance of Pleurotus sapidus (Oyster Mushroom) — shares topic coverage
- Morpho-Physiological Analyses of Selected Wheat Genotypes — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.