Comparative Study between the Efficacy of Oral Gemifloxacin and Intravenous Cefotaxime in Treatment of Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
HalaShaaban El Gendy, Osama El Sayed Negm, Amal Saied Elbendary, Sherief Mohamed Abd-Elsalam
International Journal of TROPICAL DISEASE & Health · pp. 12–22 · Published 27 Dec 2021
10.9734/ijtdh/2021/v42i2330560Abstract
Background and Aims: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is defined as a bacterial infection of the ascitic fluid (AF) that arises in individuals without an intra-abdominal source of infection that is surgically curable. SBP is a unique complication in cases with cirrhosis-linked ascites, and it can be so subtle that it is only reported by chance when paracentesis is done. SBP is handled with any of a variety of cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime or quinolones, such as Gemifloxacin. The aim was comparing the effect of oral Gemifloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in 60 individuals with cirrhosis who had SBP. Patients and Methods: The randomized controlled research involved 60 cirrhotic ascitic individuals suffering from SBP admitted to Tropical Medicine Department, Tanta University Hospital. Two groups of patients were investigated: group I included 30 cirrhotic ascitic patient suffering from SBP treated with IV cefotaxime 2gm|8 hours for 7 days and group II included 30 cirrhotic ascetic patient suffering from SBP and treated with oral Gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 7 days. Results: No substantial difference was noted among both groups regarding age, sex, or symptoms, or in laboratory tests such as hemoglobin, total leukocytic count, platelet, serum bilirubin, ALT, AST, albumin, prothrombin activity, INR, creatinine, urea, sodium, and potassium. Also, the outcome was comparable in both groups as regarding the number of treated patients (p=0.781); 20 (66.67%) cases were cured in group I and 21 (70%) cases were cured in group II and in AF analysis after treatment. By using gram stain, gram –ve organism were the predominant in group I 23 (76.7%) and group II 24 (80%) while gram +ve was detected in 7 (23.3%) and 6 (20%) in group I and II respectively. Furthermore, no substantial difference was noted among both groups regarding treatment response based on culture prior to treatment. Conclusions: Our research is the first to focus on Gemifloxacin use in the management of SBP rather than in the prevention of SBP. Since these agents' relative effectiveness is identical, cost should be the deciding factor. In conclusion, our findings indicate that cefotaxime or Gemifloxacin can be used as a first-line therapy.
Cited by 1
1 citation reported by external sources — individual citing-article records aren't available to list yet.
Related research
- Molecular Detection of Extended Spectrum Beta-lactamase Resistance in Escherichia coli from Poultry Droppings in Keffi, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Primary Health Care Setting: The Prevalence of Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms in Health Centers under the Primary Health Care Corporation PHCC, Qatar — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of Multi-drug Resistant Bacteria and High Risk of Contamination in Ready to Eat Fruits in Kano Metropolis — shares topic coverage
- Effect of Misuse of Antibiotics on Cytokine Patterns and Antibiogram of Bacteria Isolates from Surgical Site Infection in Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Prevalence and Susceptibility Analysis of Carbapenem Resistant Gram-negative Pathogens in Super Specialty Tertiary Care Center, Mumbai, India — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.