Consumer Awareness, Product Recognition and Stated Willingness to Pay for GI-Tagged Agricultural Products: An Empirical Study
R. Ravikumar, S. Sanofia, S. Ragavendhar, G. Raghavi, K. Rajkumar
Journal of Scientific Research and Reports · pp. 46–55 · Published 19 Sep 2026
10.9734/jsrr/2026/v32i104525Abstract
This study assessed consumer awareness, recognition of individual GI-tagged agricultural products, perceptions of GI-related attributes, stated willingness to pay a premium, and preferred promotional channels among visitors to a GI-product consumer expo in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu. Methodology: Primary data were collected from 90 consumers using a structured questionnaire and purposive sampling. Consumer responses to GI-related statements were measured on a five-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise consumer responses, while binary logistic regression was used as an exploratory analysis of associations between selected perception variables and stated willingness to pay a premium. Results: General understanding of GI certification was relatively high (mean score 4.20), whereas the ability to identify GI-tagged products was substantially lower (2.75), indicating an awareness–recognition gap. Perceptions of authenticity and origin were particularly favourable (4.65), as were perceptions of quality and trustworthiness (4.45 each). Seventy-five of the 90 respondents (83.33%) stated that they were willing to pay a premium for GI-tagged products; however, this represents stated premium acceptance rather than an observed monetary price premium. The exploratory logistic regression based on 86 complete observations was not statistically significant (likelihood-ratio χ² = 2.613, df = 4, P = .625; Nagelkerke R² = .052), and none of the four explanatory variables was individually significant. Promotional preferences were highest for school/college awareness programmes (29.7%), followed by television/print media (27.0%) and social media (20.7%). Conclusion: The principal finding is a substantial gap between conceptual awareness of GI certification and recognition of specific GI products. Strengthening product-level labelling, GI-logo visibility, retailer communication and consumer education may help translate general awareness into effective market recognition. Larger probability-based samples and monetary WTP measures are required for stronger inference.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Linking Farmer Producer Organizations with Other Markets – A Sustainable Change in Marketing of Farm Produce — shares topic coverage
- Marketing of Fruits and Vegetables in the Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee, Vashi, Navi Mumbai — shares topic coverage
- Market Potential, Farmer Preferences, and Awareness of Hybrid Cotton in Warangal District of Telangana State, India — shares topic coverage
- Impact of Different Modes of Agricultural Produce Sale on Farmers' Economic Performance in Chikkaballapur District, Karnataka, India — shares topic coverage
- Involvement of Agro-Based Cooperatives in Agricultural Marketing and Development in Enugu State, Nigeria: A Qualitative Analysis — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.