Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Effective Teaching of form Four History at Zimbabwe’s Dakamela Secondary School: A Comparative Study of Group Discussion and Lecture Methods

Mufunani Tungu Khosa, Alfred Champion Ncube, Thembinkosi Tshabalala

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 34–46 · Published 31 Mar 2015

10.9734/BJESBS/2015/14560

Abstract

This study was focused on the comparative effectiveness of using the group discussion method and the lecture method in the teaching and learning of history by form four students at Dakamela Secondary School in Nkayi District with the aim of finding which of the two methods better suits the teaching of this subject due to its strengths. The study used 50 students in two classes one with 26 and the other with 24 students. The population was made up of all 320 pupils in the school doing history since the subject is compulsory and is expected to be done by al the pupils. The study employed the quantitative paradigm and used the experimental design. Experiments were carried out in both classes which were exposed to both methods simultaneously. The study revealed that students who were exposed to the group discussion method performed relatively better than those exposed to the lecture method. The study recommends that students should be taught mostly using the group discussion method since it has proved to be more effective than the lecture method.

Lecture method group method form four.

Cited by 1

Lectures and Large Groups

Dujeepa D. Samarasekera, Matthew C. E. Gwee, Andrew Long · Understanding Medical Education · 2018

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

1

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.