Efficacy S-formula and Kinetics of Non-oxygen-mediated (Type-I) and Oxygen-mediated (Type-II) Corneal Cross-linking
Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal · pp. 1–11 · Published 15 Jan 2018
10.9734/OR/2018/39089Abstract
Aims: To derive analytic formulas for the overall efficacy of corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) based on coupled kinetic equations including both non-oxygen-mediated (NOM) and oxygen-mediated (OM) type-II mechanisms. Study Design: modeling the kinetics of CXL. Place and Duration of Study: Taipei, Taiwan, between June, 2017 and January 2018. Methodology: Coupled kinetic equations are derived under the quasi-steady state condition for the 3-pathway mechanisms of CXL. For type-I CXL, the riboflavin triplet state [T3] may interact directly with the stroma collagen substrate [A] under NOM, or with the ground-state oxygen [O2] to form reactive oxygen species [O-] under OM. For type-II process, [T3] interacts with [O2] to form a singlet oxygen [1O2]. Both reactive oxygen species (ROS), [O-] and [1O2], can relax to [O2], or interact with the extracellular matrix (or the stroma substrate [A]) for crosslinking. Results: In the first 3 to 20 seconds, CXL efficacy is governed by both type-I and –II mechanisms, and after that period type-I, NOM is the predominant contribution, while oxygen for OM only plays a limited and transient role, in contrary to the conventionally believed OM-dominant mechanism. The riboflavin profile has a much slower depletion rate than that of oxygen profile. The ratio between NOM-type-I and OM depends on the relative initial concentration of [A] and [1O2] and their diffusion depths in the stroma. The overall CXL efficacy is proportional to the UV light dose (or fluence), the riboflavin, C (z, t), and oxygen, [O2], initial concentration, where efficacy is limited by the depletion of either C (z, t) or [O2]. Conclusion: Resupply of riboflavin and/or oxygen concentration under a controlled-concentration-method (CCM) during the UV exposure may improve the overall efficacy, specially for the accelerated CXL which has lower efficacy than the standard Dresden low-power (under non-controlled concentration).
Cited by 13
Jui-Teng Lin, Jacques Lalevee, Da-Chun Cheng · Polymers · 2021
Jui-Teng Lin, Kuo-Ti Chen · 2022
Yin-Chen Chiu, Da-Chuan Cheng, Jui-Teng Lin · IEEE Access · 2020
Related research
- A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy of Oral Diclofenac Sodium in the Treatment of Symptomatic Osteoarthritis of the Knee in Nnewi, South Eastern Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Bacteriological and Fungal Evaluation of Three Brands of Disinfectants Sold in Calabar Municipality, Cross River State — shares topic coverage
- Drug Interactions, Safety and Efficacy of Probiotics — shares topic coverage
- The Efficacy of the Volume of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Used and Its Influence on Spinal Anaesthesia Induced Hypotension during Caesarean Section — shares topic coverage
- A Comparison of Efficacy of Two Brands of Enoxaparin in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
13
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.