Ethical and Secure Deployment of Generative AI: Balancing Innovation, Data Privacy, and Enterprise Risk Governance
Cornelia Ifeoma Ejoh, Christopher Ugbong Akeke, Oluseun Babatunde Oladoyinbo, Onyii Henry, Utin Nyimeobong Archibong
Journal of Engineering Research and Reports · pp. 48–68 · Published 30 Jun 2026
10.9734/jerr/2026/v28i71943Abstract
This study examines the ethical and secure deployment of generative artificial intelligence in enterprise environments, with emphasis on innovation, data privacy, and risk governance. It addresses the gap between the rapid organisational adoption of generative AI systems and the slower development of institutional mechanisms for managing ethical, privacy, security, and regulatory risks. The study identifies the absence of a validated, integrated governance instrument that combines ethical, privacy, security, and enterprise risk controls for the specific characteristics of generative systems. A desk-based mixed-methods approach was used, combining systematic literature review, document analysis, thematic synthesis, comparative evaluation of governance frameworks, and Analytic Hierarchy Process weighting. Evidence was drawn from peer-reviewed literature and authoritative international governance instruments. Eight governance dimensions were assessed: scope and coverage, risk classification, data privacy, ethics and accountability, security controls, legal enforceability, enterprise applicability, and adaptability to generative AI. The findings show that existing governance instruments provide useful but fragmented coverage when applied independently. Ethics and accountability emerged as the highest-weighted dimension, followed by data privacy, security controls, and enterprise applicability. The proposed framework integrates five pillars: ethics and accountability, privacy and data governance, security governance, enterprise risk management, and innovation and compliance alignment. The study concludes that responsible enterprise deployment of generative AI requires coordinated, multi-layered governance rather than reliance on isolated ethical, technical, or legal controls.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Measurement of Social Capital in Water Users Association through Analytical Hierarchy Process — shares topic coverage
- Applications of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Knowledge Management (KM) Concepts in Defect Identification: A Case of Cable Manufacturing — shares topic coverage
- A Holistic Approach to Land Valuation Using Automated Valuation Models (AVMs): A Case Study in Homagama Divisional Secretarial Administrative Boundary, Sri Lanka — shares topic coverage
- Participatory Spatial Multi-criteria Evaluation for Land-Use Planning and Decision Making in Mezam, Cameroon — shares topic coverage
- Using AHP Method Exploring the Key Factors of Choosing to Buy Luxury Products in Flagship Stores with Experiential Marketing — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.