Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Evidence Based Informed Consent for Caesarean Section Using MERLO - Meaning Equivalence Reusable Learning Objects

Tal Biron-Shental, Ron Kenett, Uri Shafrir, Hadar Rosen, Sunita Garg, Dan Farine, Ami Fishman

Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science · pp. 1–10 · Published 16 Jul 2016

10.9734/BJESBS/2016/27163

Abstract

By signing an informed consent (IC) form, patients authorize medical interventions. Application of ‘Meaning Equivalence Reusable Learning Objects (MERLO)’ assesses the level of patient understanding. We evaluated patients’ understanding of the information received during the IC for elective caesarean section. We mapped different topics that patients should understand and MERLO assessment items were prepared and scored. We evaluated 49 and 30 patients undergoing elective caesarean section at Meir Medical Center in Israel and in Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto respectively and 14 residents that were used as a reference. The mean scores were similar: 76.1±18.0 and 81.1±10.4 for Meir and Mount Sinai, respectively (P>0.05). There were no differences between the scores by investigated topics. A patient score of 90 and above represents sufficient understanding (20% of the patients). A score of 70-90 indicates that some reinforcement of the explanations is needed (40% of patients). A score below 70 (40% of patients), indicates lack of understanding that requires revising the explanation. Evaluating patients' understanding of medical explanations prior to elective procedures has become a necessity and therefore needs to be evaluated. Using MERLO techniques, we can assess how patients’ understand the physician's explanations.

Informed consent caesarean section patients' understanding

References (15)

  1. 1 Informed consent: how much and what do patients understand? [DOI]
  2. 2 Rethinking Informed Consent: The Case for Shared Medical Decision-Making [DOI]
  3. 3 Informed consent for elective surgery--what is best practice? [DOI]
  4. 4 Informed Consent and the Surgeon [DOI]
  5. 5 The placebo phenomenon and medical ethics: Rethinking the relationship between informed consent and risk–benefit assessment [DOI]
  6. 6 Statistical Methods in Healthcare [DOI]
  7. 7 14 Consent to Medical Care: The Importance of Fiduciary Context [DOI]
  8. 8 Patient Comprehension of Informed Consent [DOI]
  9. 9 Informed consent in gynecologic surgery [DOI]
  10. 10 Event-based versus process-based informed consent to address scientific evidence and uncertainties in ionising medical imaging [DOI]
  11. 11 Evidence-based Medicine and Informed Consent [DOI]
  12. 12 Patients' and Cardiologists' Perceptions of the Benefits of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stable Coronary Disease [DOI]
  13. 13 Beyond informed consent.
  14. 14 Fighting for reliable evidence [DOI]
  15. 15 Management Statistics [DOI]

Cited by 8

Why would you use medical chatbots? interview and survey

I. Chang, Yi-Syuan Shih, Kuang-Ming Kuo · Int. J. Medical Informatics · 2022

Production of Evidence-Based Informed Consent (EBIC) With Meaning Equivalence Reusable Learning Objects (MERLO)

Myrtha Elvia Reyna Vargas, Wendy Lou, Ron S. Kenett · Research Anthology on Advancements in Women's Health and Reproductive Rights · 2022

Showing 5 of 8 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

23

Page views

0

PDF downloads

4

Outbound clicks

8

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.