AmpC Beta-Lactamase Prevalence in Isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in Enugu, Nigeria
Uzoamaka Charity Maduakor, Immaculate C. Ajiromanus, Anulika Obianuju Onyemelukwe
Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences · pp. 16–26 · Published 2 Jul 2022
10.9734/jamps/2022/v24i530300Abstract
Background: Pathogenic bacteria with beta lactamase-resistant determinants have emerged, posing a worldwide health threat. They confer resistance to a large array of \(\beta\) -lactam agents and \(\beta\)-lactam inhibitors. Aim: This study evaluated the prevalence and resistance profiles of plasmid-mediated AmpC \(\beta\) -lactamase producing isolates among Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical and environmental sources in the Enugu metropolis. Methodology: The work was done in the Microbiological Laboratory of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital Ituku-Ozalla. A total of 150 non-duplicate isolates processed in the microbiology laboratories of three referral hospitals and some private laboratories were used in this study including 85 and 65 isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae respectively. Isolates were identified and characterized using standard microbiological protocols. Antimicrobial susceptibility was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion procedure. Phenotypic detection of AmpC \(\beta\)-Lactamase production was determined using Cefoxitin/Cloxacillin double-disc synergy (CCDST). Results: Of the 67 isolates of E. coli from clinical samples, AmpC production was confirmed in 20(29.9%) and of the 18 isolates from environmental sources, only 5(27.8%) were confirmed. Of the 60 isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae from clinical samples 16(26.6%) were AmpC producers while 1(20%) out of the 5 isolates from environmental samples was an AmpC producer. The prevalence of AmpC \(\beta\)-lactamase producers was 28%. There was no statistical difference in the proportion of AmpC producers in clinical and environmental isolates in E.coli and Klesiella pneumoniae p = .86 and p = .74 respectively. Antimicrobial resistance was high in both AmpC and non-AmpC \(\beta\)-lactamase producers. Impenem’s susceptibility was found in 75.4 percent of the isolates. Conclusion: This research revealed a high prevalence of AmpC beta-lactamase in the Enugu metropolis. The identification of AmpC beta-lactamase enzymes regularly is crucial to preventing therapeutic failures. The proper usage of antimicrobial drugs is critical.
Cited by 2
Saba Gebremichael Tekele, Zewudu Mulatie, Alemu Gedefie · Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control · 2025
Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Antibacterial Activity of Bidens pilosa Extracts on Escherichia coli O157: H7 Isolated from Apparently Healthy Individuals — shares topic coverage
- Urine Analysis and Determination of Drug Sensitivity Pattern of Isolated Escherichia coli from Urinary Tract Infected Patients — shares topic coverage
- Evaluation of the Effects of Pediococcus acidilactici Isolated from Wara, a Nigerian Milk Product, in the Prevention of Diarrhea and the Modulation of Intestinal Microflora in Wistar Rats — shares topic coverage
- Prevalence, Aetiological Agents and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Urinary Tract Infections among Pregnant Women Attending Mother and Child Hospital, Akure, South-West Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Molecular Detection of the Arr-2 Gene in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Resistant to Rifampicin in Abidjan, Côte D'Ivoire — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.