Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Aerobic Bacterial Isolates in Wound Infections in Navi Mumbai, India

Nitin Goel Insan, Anahita V. Bhesania Hodiwala, Ravi Vashisth, Amod Yadav, Mahesh Danu

Microbiology Research Journal International · pp. 1–6 · Published 17 Sep 2015

10.9734/BMRJ/2015/5414

Abstract

Background: Wound infection is a breach in the integrity and protective function of the skin. Mostly bacteria (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus), certain viruses (e. g. Herpes virus) and fungi (e.g. Candida albicans) are responsible for wound infection. This study was conducted for isolation, identification and antibiotic sensitivity testing of aerobic bacterial strains from wound infection. Methods: Total 216 pus samples were collected and immediately inoculated on Blood agar and MacConkey agar plates. Then the culture plates were placed in incubator at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, all isolates were identified by using Gram staining and different biochemical tests. Antibiotic sensitivity test was performed on Mueller Hinton agar plate by Kirby Bauer Disc Diffusion method as per CLSI guidelines. Results: Among 216 samples, 166 (76.8%) showed positive growth. Fifteen different bacterial species were isolated. The most commonly isolated organism was Staphylococcus aureus (26.7%) followed by Pseudomonas sp. (16.4%), Escherichia coli (11.9%), Klebsiella sp. (7.8%). Antibiotic sensitivity test showed that the most effective antibiotics for Gram positive bacteria were Linezolid (87.2%) and Ampicillin + Sulbactam (82.3%) whereas Cefotaxime (48%) was the least effective antibiotic. The most effective antibiotic for Gram negative isolates was Amikacin (72.3%) followed by Netilline (67.3%). Cefuroxime (21.9%) was the least effective antibiotic for Gram negative bacteria. Conclusion: Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated bacteria in wound infection. Linezolid and Amikacin were the most effective antibiotics for Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria, respectively.  

Wound infection Staphylococcus aureus Escherichia coli Pseudomonas sp.

Cited by 4

Bacterial Profile and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wound Infections in Misurata, Libya: Insights into MRSA and Multidrug Resistance

Adel Ashour, Nuri Eltajouri, M. Alwashaish · مجلة العلوم الاساسية و التطبيقية · 2026

Titanium Oxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles for Treatment of Wound Infection

H. Alhadrami, Raniyah A.M Shoudri · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology · 2020

Titanium Oxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles for Treatment of Wound Infection

Hani A. Alhadrami, Raniyah A.M Shoudri · Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology · 2021

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

4

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.