Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

How People Respond to Different Types of Humorous Advertising

Yueh- Hua Lee

Journal of Economics, Management and Trade · pp. 1419–1433 · Published 13 May 2014

10.9734/BJEMT/2014/9947

Abstract

Aims: This study examined the different types of humorous advertising on attitude toward advertising and brand in order to analyze the effect on brand recognition and brand recall. Study Design: This study focused on three types of humorous advertisings: cognitive, affective, and social orientation, and used an experimental method to understand the influence of humorous advertisements on advertising attitude and brand communication effects. Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted in companies in the city of Taipei, Taiwan, between May and June 2012. Methodology: This study used a 4 (affective, cognitive, social and non-humorous advertising) × 2 (low and high degree of advertising involvement) between-subjects factorial experimental design and the group of non-humorous advertisings as control groups. A total of 268 subjects were randomly and equally assigned to one of the four ads. Removing 28 copies of unusable questionnaires because of incomplete answers, 240 copies of the questionnaires were usable, resulting in a response rate of nearly 90%. Results: Findings indicate that humorous advertisings do promote brand message comprehension, and are superior to those of non-humorous advertising.  In addition, the results indicate that different types of humorous advertising have different effects on brand recognition and brand recall. Conclusion: The different types of humorous ads have statistically significant differences on various dimensions of brand communication. The humorous advertising of affective has greater brand recall than those of the humorous advertisings of social and cognitive. Furthermore, presenting an advertisement with humorous elements can transfer the consumers’ positive perceptions on the advertising to the brand itself, thus achieving effective brand communication.  

Humorous advertising brand recall brand recognition experimental design

References (37)

  1. 1 Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity [DOI]
  2. 2 An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context [DOI]
  3. 3 The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations [DOI]
  4. 4 The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising [DOI]
  5. 5 Assessing the Role of Emotions as Mediators of Consumer Responses to Advertising [DOI]
  6. 6 Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment [DOI]
  7. 7 Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers [DOI]
  8. 8 Consumer Response to Television Commercials: The Impact of Involvement and Background Music on Brand Attitude Formation [DOI]
  9. 9 Cyberspace Advertising vs. Other Media: Consumer vs. Mature Student Attitudes [DOI]
  10. 10 The Impact of Humor in Advertising: A Review [DOI]
  11. 11 The Direct and Indirect Effects of Advertising Spending on Firm Value [DOI]
  12. 12 Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions [DOI]
  13. 13 Responses to Humorous Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Need for Cognition [DOI]
  14. 14 The Humorous Message Taxonomy: A Framework for the Study of Humorous Ads [DOI]
  15. 15 Effects of Humor in a Radio Advertising Experiment [DOI]
  16. 16 Manipulating Message Involvement in Advertising Research [DOI]
  17. 17 Assessing the Use and Impact of Humor on Advertising Effectiveness: A Contingency Approach [DOI]
  18. 18 Humor in U.S. versus U.K. TV Commercials: A Comparison [DOI]
  19. 19 Provocation in advertising: A conceptualization and an empirical assessment [DOI]
  20. 20 Consumer Response to Humor in Advertising: A Series of Field Studies Using Behavioral Observation [DOI]
  21. 21 One Hundred Years of Humor in American Advertising [DOI]
  22. 22 The Effect of Type of Elaboration on Advertisement Processing and Judgment [DOI]
  23. 23 Types of Humor in Television and Magazine Advertising
  24. 24 The effect of humor on recall of a radio advertisement [DOI]
  25. 25 “Wow, That Was Funny” [DOI]
  26. 26 The Impact of Perceived Humor, Product Type, and Humor Style in Radio Advertising [DOI]
  27. 27 The Effects of Culture and Product Type on the Use of Humor in Greek TV Advertising: An Application of Speck's Humorous Message Taxonomy [DOI]
  28. 28 Humor and ad liking: Evidence that sensation seeking moderates the effects of incongruity‐resolution humor [DOI]
  29. 29 Using Humor in Conjunction with Negative Consequences in Advertising [DOI]
  30. 30 On Measuring the Power of Communications [DOI]
  31. 31 The Effect of Humor on Advertising Comprehension
  32. 32 The Effects of Humor on Ad Processing: Mediating Role of Brand Familiarity [DOI]
  33. 33 Internet Political Ads in 2012 [DOI]
  34. 34 Developing a Systematic Assessment of Humor in the Context of the 2012 U.S. General Election Debates [DOI]
  35. 35 Humor and Brand Image-Shaping: A Content Analysis of "America Runs on Dunkin" Campaign Television Advertisements
  36. 36 A Study on the Food Product Commercials in Television with Reference to Humour Appeal [DOI]
  37. 37 Deciphering the Internet Advertising Puzzle

Cited by 7

Showing 5 of 7 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

37

Page views

0

PDF downloads

23

Outbound clicks

7

Citations

Views over time

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.