Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Improving Fruit Production and Recording Profitability Assessments in Kiwifruit cv. Allison Using Different Horticultural Techniques and Growth Regulators

Kehar Raj, Gh. Irshad Hassan, Shamim A. Simnani, Satpal, Aniket Sharma, Khalid Z. Masoodi, Imran Khan, Farahanaz Rasool, Farhet A. Shaheen, Kusumakar Gautam, Baiza Shidiqi, Khalid Feroz

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 311–320 · Published 6 Jul 2026

10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i74334

Abstract

The present investigation was conducted at the Division of Fruit Science, Faculty of Horticulture, SKUAST-K, Shalimar, Jammu and Kashmir, to evaluate the economic feasibility of selected horticultural practices and plant growth regulators in kiwifruit cv. Allison. Fifteen treatments, including girdling, summer pruning, fruit thinning, CPPU, homobrassinolide, benzyl adenine, GA₃ and their combinations, were evaluated in a randomised complete block design with three replications. The economic analysis considered basic annual cost, treatment cost, total cost, gross return, net return and benefit-cost ratio per hectare. The treatments differed in profitability mainly through their influence on the proportion of A-, B- and C-grade fruits and the associated market returns. Among all treatments, CPPU @ 5 ppm + homobrassinolide @ 0.15 ppm recorded the highest gross return (₹2,885,770.24 ha⁻¹), net return (₹2,768,415.844 ha⁻¹) and benefit-cost ratio (23.59). This treatment also produced the highest A-grade yield percentage (70.11%) and provided a 1.80-fold increase in net return over the control. HBL @ 1 ppm and CPPU @ 10 ppm also generated comparatively high returns, but their benefit-cost ratios were lower than that of CPPU @ 5 ppm + HBL @ 0.15 ppm. The findings indicate that this combined PGR treatment was the most economically viable option for improving profitability in kiwifruit cv. Allison under the tested temperate conditions.

Kiwifruit Actinidia deliciosa cv. Allison CPPU homobrassinolide plant growth regulators girdling fruit thinning gross return net return benefit-cost ratio

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.