Evaluation of Bread Wheat (Tritium aestivum L.) Genotype in Multi-environment Trials Using Enhanced Statistical Models
Gadisa Alemu, Berhanu Sime, Negash Geleta, Alemu Dabi, Ruth Duga, Abebe Delesa, Habtemariam Zegaye, Tafesse Solomon, Demeke Zewdu, Dawit Asnake, Bayisa Asefa, Abebe Getamesay, Bekele Abeyo, Ayele Badebo, Tilahun Bayisa, Shitaye Homa, Endashaw Girma
Asian Journal of Research in Agriculture and Forestry · pp. 67–79 · Published 1 Oct 2024
10.9734/ajraf/2024/v10i4317Abstract
In varietal selection field trials, spatial variation and genotype by environment (GxE) interaction are frequent and present a major challenge to plant breeders comparing the genetic potential of several cultivars. To consistently select superior cultivars that increase agricultural production, bread wheat breeding studies must be evaluated using efficient statistical techniques. By modeling the interactions of geographical field trends and genotypes by environment interaction, this work aimed to forecast the genetic potential of bread wheat varieties across settings and improve selection tactics. The dataset utilized in this investigation consisted of sixteen multi-environment trials (MET) that were carried out using a randomized complete block design (RCBD), with two replications arranged in plot arrays of rows and columns. The findings showed that the factor analytical and spatial models were effective ways to analyze the data for this study under the linear mixed model. By ranking average Best Linear Unbiased Predictions (BLUPs) within clusters, the 16 bread wheat environments were grouped into three mega environments (C1, C2, and C3) based on yield. This served as a selection indicator. Ranking average BLUPs helped in the selection of superior and stable genotypes. The first cluster (C1)'s mean BLUP values were used to score the genotypes' performance; C2 and C3 were excluded because of their limited genetic variety and low genetic connection with the other trials. The genotypes with the highest potential based on this cluster were EBW192346 and EBW192347, chosen for a subsequent verification study to release a variety. The estimates for variance component parameters ranged from 0.013 to 3.024 for genetic variance and from 0.072 to 0.37 for error variance. Hence, scaling up the use of this efficient analysis method will improve the selection of superior bread wheat varieties.
Cited by 1
Bayisa Asefa, Negash Geleta, Demeke Zewedu · Journal of Basic and Applied Research International · 2024
Related research
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Drug Resistant Shigella Species Isolated from North-East, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Assessment of Genetic Divergence in Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) Genotypes — shares topic coverage
- Genetic Divergence in Micronutrient Rich wheat– A Tool to Identify Diverse Parents — shares topic coverage
- Genetic Diversity Analysis for Yield and Morpho-physiological Traits in Elite Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Genotypes under Semi-dry System Through D2 Statistics — shares topic coverage
- Assessment of Genetic Divergence in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Western U.P — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.