Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Performance of Pyroxasulfone to Control Amaranthus palmeri and Salsola kali in Peanut

Peter A. Dotray, Todd A. Baughman, W. James Grichar, Jason E. Woodward

Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 1–10 · Published 17 May 2018

10.9734/JEAI/2018/41505

Abstract

Aims: Determine weed efficacy and peanut tolerance to pyroxasulfone in the Texas High Plains peanut growing area.                                                     Study Design: Randomized complete block design with 3 replications.                            Place and Duration of Study: Weed efficacy studies were conducted during 2013 and 2014 at the Texas A&M AgriLife Research and Extension Center near Halfway (34.188o N, 101.952o W) and near Seagraves (32.9369o N, 102.5409o W). Peanut tolerance studies were conducted during 2014 and 2015 near Brownfield (33.1042o N, 102.1615o W). Methodology: Plots were four rows wide spaced 102 cm apart and 9.5 m long.  Herbicides were applied with a CO2 compressed-air backpack sprayer using Teejet Turbo Tee 11002 flat fan nozzles which delivered 140 L ha-1 at 207 kPa. In the weed efficacy studies, field plots were naturally infested with moderate Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.) populations while Russian thistle (Salsola kali L.) populations were low to moderate. Weed control and peanut injury was visually estimated on a scale of 0 indicating no control and 100 indicating complete control or plant death, relative to the untreated control. In the variety tolerance study, pyroxasulfone alone at 0.09 and 0.18 kg ha-1 was compared with flumioxazin + pyroxasulfone at 0.07 + 0.09 and 0.14 + 0.18 kg ha-1, respectively applied PRE. This area was kept weed-free. Results: Pyroxasulfone, applied either PRE or EPOST, provided at least 95% A. palmeri control while pyroxasulfone applied PRE followed by paraquat applied EPOST controlled Salsola kali 97%.  This was as good as all other herbicide treatments with the exception of either pyroxasulfone or dimethenamid-P plus paraquat applied EPOST and followed by imazethapyr applied LPOST, which provided only 58% control. Conclusion: These results indicate that pyroxasulfone can be an effective herbicide for control of Amaranthus palmeri and Salsola kali in peanut. All peanut varieties evaluated showed excellent tolerance to pyroxasulfone.

Arachis hypogaea L preplant incorporated preemergence postemergence peanut stunting

Cited by 6

Carfentrazone Plus Pyroxasulfone Combinations for Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

W. Grichar, Peter A. Dotray, T. Baughman · Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · 2021

Evaluation of Diquat and Glufosinate for Weed Control in Peanut

Deyu Yang, Haifeng Liu, Xiao (Steve) Li · 2023

Eficácia e interação da associação de Flumioxazin e Pyroxasulfone para controle de capim-colonião (Panicum maximum)

Jéssica Cursino Presoto, Acácio Gonçalves Netto, Jeisiane de Fátima Andrade · Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias · 2022

Weed Control in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Using Carfentrazone Plus Pyroxasulfone Herbicide Systems

William James Grichar, Peter A. Dotray, Todd A. Baughman · Agricultural Sciences · 2024

Evaluating herbicide programs for peanut response and weed control

Prasanna Kharel, Pratap Devkota, Gregory MacDonald · Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management · 2022

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.