Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 4.0

Privacy-enhancing Methods for Secure Sharing of Land and Environmental Data across Collaborative Research Institutions and Open Data Ecosystems

Busola Motunrayo Olawale, Utin Nyimeobong Archibong, Nanyeneke Ravana Mayeke, Abiola Omolola Bamsa, Omobolaji Olufunmilayo Olateju

Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science · pp. 145–161 · Published 2 Jun 2026

10.9734/ajrcos/2026/v19i5866

Abstract

This research developed and evaluated hybrid privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) for secure sharing of land use and land cover (LULC) data across collaborative research institutions and open data ecosystems. The work was motivated by privacy risks, including re-identification via linkage attacks, inference of sensitive attributes, and data-sovereignty concerns in geospatial environmental datasets. A comprehensive literature review established the theoretical foundations of federated learning (FL), differential privacy (DP), secure multi-party computation (SMPC), homomorphic encryption (HE), and blockchain. The methodology employed a quantitative, simulation-based design. Because access to real institutional archives was beyond the scope of this study, synthetic Sentinel-2-like patches were generated programmatically and augmented with EuroSAT and NLCD-derived class schemas. These were partitioned into non-IID institutional silos to emulate heterogeneous collaborations. Hybrid PET pipelines integrated FL with DP via Opacus, SMPC aggregation, HE verification, and blockchain-based audit logging of model updates. Evaluation used accuracy, F1-score, the (ε, δ) budget tracked by a Rényi accountant, communication cost, and statistical tests. Following the standard DP convention, a smaller ε corresponds to more added noise and stronger privacy, while a larger ε relaxes privacy in exchange for utility. Results revealed substantial privacy-utility trade-offs and confirmed the expected inverse relationship between privacy level and utility. The unusually high centralized accuracy and the near-zero vanilla-FL accuracy are interpreted as artifacts of the small synthetic corpus and the lightweight model, rather than realistic estimates. The study addresses key gaps by providing practical blueprints for secure LULC collaboration. Conclusions affirm the potential of PETs, while highlighting the architectural refinements required for deployment at scale. Recommendations include scaling to real archives, mitigating non-IID heterogeneity, adopting post-quantum-ready cryptography, and embedding indigenous data-sovereignty safeguards into PET design.

Privacy-enhancing technologies federated learning differential privacy land use land Cover open data ecosystems

Cited by 0

No indexed citations yet.

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

0

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.