A Comparative Study of a New Microtensile Testing Device for Dental Research
Gustavo Rivera, Lilian Marly de Paula, Tien Li An, Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Garcia, Paulo Márcio Yamaguti, Andréia de Aquino Marsiglio, Raquel Lanna Passos, Ana Carolina Acevedo, José Alexander Araújo
Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology · pp. 1–9 · Published 2 Dec 2015
10.9734/BJAST/2016/22167Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to compare the performance of a new microtensile bond strength (µTBS) testing device, called the Flextest device. Study Design: This is an experimental randomised study in which composite resin/dentin stick-shaped specimens were submitted to a microtensile bond strength test in both Flextest device and Bencor Multi-T device. Place and Duration of Study: University of Brasília (Brasília, Brazil). The duration of this study is 2 years. Methodology: Fifteen human third molars were submitted to dentin surface exposure, polishing, bonding treatment, and composite blocks that were built up and sectioned to obtain composite resin/dentin stick-shaped specimens with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.9 mm². One hundred composite resin/dentin specimens were assigned randomly to the Bencor Multi-T device (Danville Engineering, San Ramon, CA, USA) group (n = 50) and the Flextest device group (n = 50). Tensile bond testing was performed by a universal testing machine (MTS, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The intragroup and intergroup µTBS comparisons, and the ratios of the types of failure in each group were analysed by factorial analysis of variance, Fisher`s test, and the Chi square test at 5% significance. Results: Both devices showed significant intragroup differences. However, the differences were not significant between the devices. Conclusion: The new Flextest device and the Bencor Multi-t device had similar microtensile bond strength test results; however, a lower standard deviation was observed in the Flextest device group.
Cited by 1
M. Yaman, L. Hardan, Georges Najjar · International Arab Journal of Dentistry · 2025
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
1
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.