Valorisation of Crop Residue Ash as a Soil Amendment and Construction Material: Mechanisms, Limitations and Future Pathways
Chittimothu Suresh Babu, B. Chaitanya Naik, Jaddu Uma, K. Jaswanth
Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research · pp. 1–14 · Published 18 Jun 2026
10.9734/ajaar/2026/v26i6731Abstract
Global agricultural systems generate substantial quantities of crop residues, and a considerable fraction is still managed through open-field burning, with associated greenhouse-gas emissions, particulate release and losses of soil organic matter. Crop residue ash (CRA), produced through combustion or pyrolysis of these residues, has potential value as both a soil amendment and a construction material. This review synthesises the reported evidence on CRA derived from major crop residues, including rice husk, wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse, maize cob, cotton stalk and groundnut shell. The review characterises variation in ash chemistry, mineralogy, alkalinity, particle size and silica phase, and relates these properties to agronomic and engineering performance. In soils, CRA can contribute to acidity correction, silicon nutrition, potassium and base-cation replenishment, cation exchange capacity enhancement and selected improvements in physical condition; however, response depends strongly on ash type, soil properties and application rate. In construction, high-silica ashes such as rice husk ash and sugarcane bagasse ash can function as supplementary cementitious materials, while selected ashes have been examined in geopolymer, alkali-activated binder, asphalt-filler and sub-base stabilisation applications. The manuscript also evaluates important constraints, including heavy-metal concentration, leaching risk, nutrient imbalance, salinisation, variable quality and the lack of harmonised standards. A recurring distinction is made between ash generated by open-field burning and controlled combustion, as the former is generally less consistent and less reactive. Priority pathways include integrated life cycle assessment, soil microbiome studies, geopolymer optimisation, regulatory harmonisation and techno-economic evaluation. Overall, CRA valorisation offers a plausible circular-economy route, but safe and reliable application requires feedstock-specific characterisation, quality control and context-specific guidance.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Waste-to-Energy: A Circular Economy Tool towards Climate Change Mitigation in Imo State, South-Eastern, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- A Guide to People Management Practices Focused on the Circular Economy: A Theoretical Approach — shares topic coverage
- Eco-friendly Plant Disease Management Using Spent Mushroom Substrate — shares topic coverage
- The Role of Blockchain in Green Marketing: Evidence from Agriculture and Consumer Perceptions in India — shares topic coverage
- From Waste to Resource: Assessing Governance Models for Implementing Circular Economy Principles in Urban Water and Nutrient Management in Ghana — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.