Physico-chemical and Nutritional Evaluation of Cookies with Different Levels of Rosehip and Hibiscus Powder Substitution
Surbhi Antarkar, Anurag Sharma, Anushka Bhargava, Honey Gupta, Ritu Tomar, Sakshi Srivastava
Archives of Current Research International · pp. 1–10 · Published 8 May 2019
10.9734/acri/2019/v17i330109Abstract
Aim: Food with high nutritional value is in great demand for proper functioning of body systems and potential health benefits. As a result, value-added foods or functional foods with higher level of dietary fiber and antioxidant have developed, especially in bakery products such as cookies. This study was aimed to develop and evaluate proximate composition, phenolic compounds, vitamin C content and sensory acceptance of cookies. Study Design: The formulations were prepared (20% rosehip powder and 15% hibiscus powder in formulation CF1, 15% rosehip powder and 20% hibiscus powder in formulation CF2, 15% rosehip powder and 15 % hibiscus powder in formulation CF 3) in a standard cookie recipe. Place and Duration of Study: Department Of Food Technology, ITM University Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, (India), between June 2018 to February 2019. Methodology: The proximate analysis,phytochemical analysis and sensory analysis of cookies was done using standard AACC International procedures. Results: Cookies prepared from formulation second (15% rose hips and 25% hibiscus powder) was more acceptable than other formulations on the basis of sensory evaluation. Conclusion: The analysis revealed that the increment in substitution in flour has increased the health benefits of cookies when compared to control cookies. The substitution with Rose hips and Hibiscus powder has a significant share in enhancing the TPC content, Total antioxidant capacity and other bioactive compounds in cookies. For sensory quality the CF2 formulation (the overall acceptability) has found greatest in all formulations. Substitution with Rose hips and Hibiscus could bring much potential health benefits to the consumer by adding nutritional (crude fat, crude protein and crude fiber) as well as organoleptic properties.
Cited by 14
Aditya Kumar, Anjali Sahal, Purnima Kumari · Food and Humanity · 2025
Ved Prakash Giri, Pallavi Shukla, Ashutosh Tripathi · Plants · 2023
Faculty of Food Engineering, University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I” from Timisoara, Calea Aradului No. 119, 300645 Timisoara, Romania, Ioana-Alina Pop,, Diana Moigrădean · Journal of Agroalimentary Processes and Technologies · 2025
Dipak K. Sarode, Madhuri C. Pagariya, Pritam R. Jadhav · Journal of Food Composition and Analysis · 2024
Related research
- Nutrient Analysis and Antimicrobial Activities of the Leaves and Fruit Pulp Extracts of Tetrapluera tetraptera on Clinical Bacteria Isolates — shares topic coverage
- The Effect of E-waste Dumpsite Soil on Cultured Tilapia Fish and Associated Microorganisms — shares topic coverage
- Assessing the Microbiological Level and the Incidence of Water-soaking on the Proximate Composition of two Cultivars of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) Grains Grown in Côte d’Ivoire — shares topic coverage
- Proximate Composition of Banana and Pineapple Wine Fermented by Meyerozyma guilliermondii and Pichia guilliermondii — shares topic coverage
- Chemical and Sensory Evaluation of Cereal-Based Complementary Foods Supplemented with Soybean and Monkey Kola — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
14
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.