Modelling Wheat Productivity under Deficit Irrigation
Vipin Mishra, D. M. Denis, Rajesh Singh, Anupriya Paul
International Journal of Environment and Climate Change · pp. 283–296 · Published 25 Nov 2022
10.9734/ijecc/2022/v12i121465Abstract
This research was carried out to simulate wheat growth under deficit irrigation across two cropping years (2020-21 and 2021-22) at Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh India. Crop growth simulation models are useful for evaluating the impact of water scarcity on crop productivity and crop yield. The AquaCrop model is one of these available options and this model is capable of simulating water productivity, grain yield, biomass yield, and canopy cover. Major inputs for the model in this investigation are climate, soil characteristics, plant attributes, and the management of crop cultivation. The results of the simulation revealed that the model accurately simulates grain yield, water productivity, biomass yield, and canopy cover at different amount of irrigation. The simulated and observed grain yield coefficients of determination (R2) were 0.96 and 0.95, respectively. The model simulation performed well (RMSE=0.131, NRMSE=3.75) and model efficiency (EF) was 0.99. Simulated and observed water productivity is equivalent at different amount of irrigation regimes. The model simulation performed well (RMSE=0.106 and NRMSE=5.00). Simulated and observed water productivity had EF of 0.99 and R2 of 0.96. The model simulation of biomass under different amount of irrigation varied between RMSE ranged from 0.492 to 0.857, NRMSE ranged from 9.239 to 17.513 and EF ranged from 0.97 to 0.99. Coefficients of determination (R2) of simulated biomass yield and observed biomass of all treatments were 0.99. It was determined that the simulated canopy cover for all treatments at different amount of irrigation had successfully adapted to the observed canopy cover. Thus, the RMSE varied from 13.344 to 18.974, the NRMSE from 20.770 to 33.223, and the EF from 0.91 to 0.96 for model simulations treated to various interventions. Coefficients of determination (R2) of simulated canopy cover for all treatments were 0.97, although R2 of observed canopy cover for various treatments ranged from 0.88 to 0.92.
References (14)
- 1 Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements
- 2 Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment [DOI]
- 3 Yield response to water.
- 4 AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles [DOI]
- 5 Crop yield response to water
- 6 On the conservative behavior of biomass water productivity [DOI]
- 7 Food security: the challenge of increasing wheat yield and the importance of not compromising food safety [DOI]
- 8 Effect of Climate Change on the Yield of Cereal Crops: A Review [DOI]
- 9 Grains – a major source of sustainable protein for health [DOI]
- 10 Parameterization and Evaluation of the AquaCrop Model for Full and Deficit Irrigated Cotton [DOI]
- 11 AquaCrop-OS: An open source version of FAO's crop water productivity model [DOI]
- 12 Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop [DOI]
- 13 Canopy Cover and Leaf Area Index Relationships for Wheat, Triticale, and Corn [DOI]
- 14 Characterization of water use and productivity dynamics across four C3 and C4 row crops under optimal growth conditions [DOI]
Cited by 2
Ghanshyam Giri, Manoj Yadav, Hitesh Upreti · Irrigation Science · 2026
Showing 1 of 2 known citations — external sources report more than can currently be individually listed.
Related research
- Pattern of Hearing Impairment in a Tertiary Institution in Ado Ekiti, Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Weight Gain as Tuberculosis Treatment Regimen Progresses in Patients Receiving Antituberculosis Therapy — shares topic coverage
- TREAT-B has Good Accuracy in Selecting HBV Infected Patients for Treatment in Sudan — shares topic coverage
- Botox Treatment: A Comprehensive Review — shares topic coverage
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare Analytics: From Diagnosis to Treatment Optimization — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
66
Page views
0
PDF downloads
42
Outbound clicks
2
Citations
Views over time
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.