Skip to content
Research Article Open access CC BY 3.0

Is the Total Score of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Associated with Suicide Attempts or Suicides?

Janus Christian Jakobsen, Erik Simonsen, Kirsten Buch Rasmussen, Christian Gluud

Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research · pp. 140–152 · Published 21 Dec 2012

10.9734/BJMMR/2013/1709

Abstract

Background: Most evidence behind interventions for depression is, in essence, based on the total score of the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). We identified no systematic review or meta-analysis examining if a total 17-item HDRS score is associated with suicide attempts or suicides in depressive patients. Methodology: Based on a systematic literature search CENTRAL in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and Science Citation Index Expanded, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed observational studies examining if the total 17-item HDRS score is associated with suicide attempts or suicides. Results: We identified and included ten cohort studies - seven retrospective and three prospective. All the studies were assessed as high risk of bias. Meta-analysis on the HDRS scores from three retrospective studies showed that depressive patients with a suicide attempt during the on-going depressive episode had a significantly higher score on the HDRS compared to non-suicidal patients (mean difference 6.31 HDRS; 95% confidence interval 4.72 to 7.91; P<0.00001, I2=0). However, meta-analyses of the HDRS scores from three prospective studies and four studies reporting retrospectively lifetime suicide attempts showed no significant differences between patients with or without a suicide attempt or suicide. Conclusion: A total score on the HDRS does not seem to be associated with past or future suicide attempts or suicides. There seems to be a need for other assessment tools to predict and explain risks of suicidality.

Hamilton predictors suicide suicidal tendencies depression observational studies systematic review meta-analysis

Cited by 6

Mentalization‐based treatment and its evidence‐base status: A systematic literature review

Javier Malda‐Castillo, Claire Browne, Guillermo Perez‐Algorta · Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice · 2018

Katakam and co-workers have not shown SSRIs to be harmful and ineffective and should stop claiming that they have

Fredrik Hieronymus, Alexander Lisinski, Jakob Näslund · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · 2018

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are still harmful and ineffective. Responses to the comments by Hieronymus et al.

Kiran Kumar Katakam, Naqash Javaid Sethi, Janus Christian Jakobsen · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · 2019

Article metrics

Real usage data collected on this platform.

0

Page views

0

PDF downloads

0

Outbound clicks

6

Citations

Views by country

Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".

No views recorded yet.

Traffic sources

Referring site, by host.

No traffic recorded yet.

Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.