Negative Appendectomy Rates -Current Prospective- A Review

References (42)

1. 1 Diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis: 2020 update of the WSES Jerusalem guidelines [DOI]
2. 2 Low-Dose Abdominal CT for Evaluating Suspected Appendicitis [DOI]
3. 3 Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis [DOI]
4. 4 The global, regional, and national burden of appendicitis in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 [DOI]
5. 5 Biomarkers of acute appendicitis: systematic review and cost–benefit trade-off analysis [DOI]
6. 6 Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis [DOI]
7. 7 Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score [DOI]
8. 8 Sensitivity and Specificity of the Individual CT Signs of Appendicitis: Experience with 200 Helical Appendiceal CT Examinations [DOI]
9. 9 Negative appendicectomy rate as a quality metric in the management of appendicitis: impact of computed tomography, Alvarado score and the definition of negative appendicectomy [DOI]
10. 10 Acute appendicitis: Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado scoring system [DOI]
11. 11 If not appendicitis, then what else can it be? A retrospective review of 1492 appendectomies.
12. 12 The Introduction of Adult Appendicitis Score Reduced Negative Appendectomy Rate [DOI]
13. 13 Evaluation of modified Alvarado scoring system and RIPASA scoring system as diagnostic tools of acute appendicitis [DOI]
14. 14 The Negative Appendectomy Rate: Who Benefits From Preoperative CT? [DOI]
15. 15 Diagnostic Imaging Utilization in Cases of Acute Appendicitis: Multi-Center Experience [DOI]
16. 16 Ultrasound and CT in the Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Accuracy With Consideration of Indeterminate Examinations According to STARD Guidelines [DOI]
17. 17 Abdominal Ultrasound and Its Diagnostic Accuracy in Diagnosing Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis [DOI]
18. 18 Efficacy of the Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers for the Reduction of Negative Appendectomy Rates [DOI]
19. 19 Is the platelet to lymphocyte ratio a promising biomarker to distinguish acute appendicitis? Evidence from a systematic review with meta-analysis [DOI]
20. 20 Ultrasound for Appendicitis: Performance and Integration with Clinical Parameters [DOI]
21. 21 One year negative appendicectomy rates at a district general hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study [DOI]
22. 22 Negative appendectomy rate in patients diagnosed with acute appendicitis [DOI]
23. 23 Negative Appendicectomy Rate: Incidence and Predictors [DOI]
24. 24 Comparison of Appendicitis Scoring Systems in Childhood Appendicitis [DOI]
25. 25 Diagnostic accuracy of a pragmatic, ultrasound-based approach to adult patients with suspected acute appendicitis in the ED [DOI]
26. 26 Assessment of the Diagnostic Value of Novel Biomarkers in Adult Patients With Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-Sectional Study [DOI]
27. 27 Revisiting delayed appendectomy in patients with acute appendicitis [DOI]
28. 28 How much Reliable Is Alvarado Scoring System in Reducing Negative Appendectomy? [DOI]
29. 29 Value of Alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis [DOI]
30. 30 To Determine Validation of RIPASA Score in Diagnosis of Suspected Acute Appendicitis and Histopathological Correlation with Applicability to Indian Population: a Single Institute Study [DOI]
31. 31 Role of C-Reactive Protein, White Blood Cell Counts, Bilirubin Levels, and Imaging in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis as a Cause of Right Iliac Fossa Pain [DOI]
32. 32 Role of preoperative computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and reduction of negative appendectomy rates: Retrospective cross-sectional study [DOI]
33. 33 Incidence of negative appendectomy: experience from a company hospital in Nigeria.
34. 34 Appendicitis Inflammatory Response Score in Acute Appendicitis: A Study at a Tertiary Care Center in North India [DOI]
35. 35 Appendicitis: Clinical implications in negative appendectomy [DOI]
36. 36 We can reduce negative paediatric appendicectomy rate: A cohort study [DOI]
37. 37 Negative Appendectomy Rate in Urban Referral Hospitals in Tanzania: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Associated Factors [DOI]
38. 38 Efficacy in Predicting Negative Appendectomy Rates in Operated Acute Appendicitis Patients Using the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) Score Versus Modified Alvarado Score [DOI]
39. 39 Evaluation of negative appendicectomy rate in cases of suspected acute appendicitis and to study the usefulness of ultrasonography in improving the diagnostic accuracy [DOI]
40. 40 Inflammatory Markers in Acute Appendicitis:Are we Still Looking forthe Philosopher’s Stone? [DOI]
41. 41 IMPACT OF CT-FACT ON NEGATIVE APPENDECTOMY RATES: PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION FROM A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL
42. 42 Negative appendectomy rate during 5 years in Modarres Hospital of Tehran, Iran, and correlation with imaging [DOI]

Cited by 2

Related research

• Complicated Appendicitis-An Update : A Narrative Review — shares topic coverage
• Stump Appendicitis: An Update on Current Management: A Narrative Review Article — shares topic coverage
• Updates on the Management of Complicated Appendicitis: Review Article — shares topic coverage
• Pinworms and Appendicitis: About 10 Cases with Review of Literature — shares topic coverage
• Role of Serum C-Reactive Protein in Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Modified Alvarado Score in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Cross-sectional Study — shares topic coverage