Nutrient Management Through Inorganic Fertilizers and Bio-stimulants in Mustard (Brassica juncea L.)
S.H. Lohale, T.N. Thorat, P.S. Bodake, M.C. Kasture, R.L. Kunkerkar, V.A. Rajemahadik, M.J. Mane
Journal of Experimental Agriculture International · pp. 22–29 · Published 2 Jan 2025
10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i13199Abstract
Aims: The field experiment was conducted to find out the effect of fertilizer levels and bio-stimulants on growth, yield and economics of mustard (Brassica juncea L.). Study Design: This experiment was laid out in strip plot design comprising three fertilizer levels in horizontal strips and five bio-stimulants in vertical strips replicated thrice. Place and Duration of Study: The field trial was carried out at the Instructional Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dr. B.S.K.K.V., Dapoli, Ratnagiri, Maharashtra, India during Rabi 2023-24. Methodology: The treatments consist of three horizontal strips of fertilizer levels viz., 80% RDF (F1), 100% RDF (F2), 120% RDF (F3) and five vertical strips of bio-stimulants viz., 0.5% humic acid (B1), 0.5% chitosan (B2), 3% vermiwash (B3), 1% Konkan kalp (B4), 0.1% triacontanol (B5). The seeds of mustard var. Varuna were sown at the spacing of 30 cm × 10 cm. The recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF) used for the crop was 90:45:00 NPK kg ha-1. Foliar application of bio-stimulants were carried out at 20, 40 and 60 days after sowing (DAS). Results: Among the fertilizer levels, application of 120% RDF (F3) recorded significantly higher growth, yield attributes and yield of mustard as well as it shows higher net returns (Rs. 25739 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.41). The seed and stover yield of mustard was increased by 12.95% and 8.30% respectively, with the application of 120% RDF as compared to the application of 80% RDF (F1) which recorded significantly minimum seed and stover yield in mustard. The growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of mustard were found significantly higher with the foliar application of 0.5% humic acid (B1) and it remained at par with the treatment foliar sprays 0.5% chitosan (B2). The net returns (Rs. 26760 ha-1) and benefit: cost ratio (1.43) was also found higher with the treatment of 0.5% humic acid (B1). With respect to bio-stimulants, foliar sprays of 0.5% humic acid (B1) showed 17.38% and 13.90% increase in seed and stover yield, respectively over foliar application of 0.1% triacontanol (B5) which recorded lowest yield in mustard. Combined application of 120% RDF and foliar sprays of 0.5% humic acid (F3B1) recorded significantly higher seed and stover yield of mustard and it remained at par with the treatment combination of 120% RDF and foliar sprays of 0.5% chitosan (F3B2). Conclusion: Application of 120% RDF along with foliar application 0.5% humic acid or 0.5% chitosan might improve the yield and economic returns in mustard.
Cited by 0
No indexed citations yet.
Related research
- Evaluating Patients’ Level of Satisfaction on the Quality of Health Services in Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- A Comparative Assessment of Access to Healthcare of People Living in Ekiti and Kogi States of Nigeria — shares topic coverage
- Patients’ Satisfaction regarding Eye Care Services in a Multi-specialty Eye Hospital of Northern Bangladesh — shares topic coverage
- Depression and Quality of Life among Urban Elderly in Dhaka City during the Covid-19 Pandemic — shares topic coverage
- Survey of the Quality Physical, Chemical and Bacteriological of the Underground Waters of the Continental Terminal of the Township of Abomey-Calavi (Benin) — shares topic coverage
Article metrics
Real usage data collected on this platform.
0
Page views
0
PDF downloads
0
Outbound clicks
0
Citations
Views by country
Approximate, from request IP at view time — not citizenship or institution. Countries with fewer than 5 views are grouped as "Other".
No views recorded yet.
Traffic sources
Referring site, by host.
No traffic recorded yet.
Views and downloads exclude known bots/crawlers. Citations combines this platform's own DOI-resolved index with each external source's own reported total — see Cited by above for individually listed citing works. Last refreshed 0 seconds ago.